Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>"Whatever they spent on their lawsuit could have been saved by a phone call."

Wasn't Microsoft's precise concern that such a call could have been tantamount to giving botnet operators advance notice? I seem to recall when this was discussed previously that some HN commenters had similar experiences with traffic from No-Ip domains and considered them to be in cahoots with the botnet operators.



You've shown the unfortunate side effect of Microsoft's libel. Now, many people think no-ip is a shady organization. It isn't the least bit true, and there was no link between no-ip and the people abusing their service.


Perhaps but beyond vague allusions there haven't been any facts provided that I can see that show that is the case.


But those allegations just doesn't make sense. Does anyone seriously believe botnet operators to be paying customers of No-IP?

Why else would they give them advance notice? Out of spite? No-IP has absolutely nothing to gain from it and everything to lose.

It just doesn't make sense. Has there ever been any real indication that this was the case?


They would not do it on purpose. The fear was about accidentally somehow letting it slip. No idea how.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: