Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, the jpegcrush functionality is implemented in C as an extension to libjpeg-turbo. But yes, I suppose a shell script would achieve roughly the same result.


So why wasn't this upstreamed to libjpeg-turbo? Why fork at all? libjpeg-turbo is still an actively maintained project after all...


Maintainer has different priorities, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7349117


They want to do much more, and with a fork you don't have to justify and discuss every single commit with the original maintainer. If you want to modify heavily something, a fork is the right approach.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: