Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Either that, or it's a perfectly fine social network I use routinely to stay in touch with several friends who don't use Facebook or Twitter.


If a such a highly publicized Google product is only used by "several friends" years after launch, it should be killed--not spammed more into the faces of users that do not want it.


The "several friends" I contact through Google+ are actual friends that I actually contact routinely, unlike the vast majority of the 200 or so friends I have on Facebook. Maybe I'm just unpopular, but I don't have more than a dozen actual close friends that I communicate with routinely.


Maybe he's talking about the ads, not plus. If the recommendations are just for people in your "friends" circle this recommendation engine has minimal impact. And just because I circle some people in Plus doesn't mean I want to see their recommendations.


You're not required to have 200 friends on fb. Just unfriend the not so real friends. You could have not do real friends on google+ too if you chose.

Most my close friends are not on google+.


Sounds like bias by anecdote to me. Google+ is a quite well thought-out and executed social network, especially compared to Facebook.


I have my Facebook settings fairly well customized so that I only see updates from my closer friends. My point was that "several friends" is not a meaninglessly small number for a social network.


Like Google Reader? /ducks


Even then, I bet Google Reader had a higher happy user to pissed user ratio than Google+.


Yeah, Google was pushing Reader on every opportunity they could and still was a wasteland.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: