Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The Reg is really hard to read -- the writing quality is horrifyingly bad.

Why not link directly to the primary source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitrat...



Indeed. It kind of read like Hunting of the Snark.

"The wikifiddler drew his wikivorpal sword and slayed the terrible wikibeast"


El Reg has a long-standing grudge against Wikipedia. And they're showing it here. :)


That's Jabberwocky, not Hunting of the Snark.


I voted up this article -- because I think the underlying story is interesting -- but article itself is viciously anti-Wikipedia.

I doubt the writing quality is particularly bad, though: I suspect the author is telling exactly the story he intended to tell.


I find these sorts of pages on wikipedia even more fascinating than the content itself. The core community is incredible. This primary source is so raw, genuine, but true.


I usually avoid the Reg but never quite noticed this when I have been there. I had only skimmed the first couple paragraphs but after reading this I went back to it. Wow. You're right. It is pretty juvenile writing. This writer abuses the use of "and" and "but."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: