Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I pretty much entirely agree with you. Below is a copy/paste of what I said when I saw this article elsewhere. What language is your LSP for?

> I written a LSP for my prototype compiler. I don't like any of the options you listed. My LSP didn't do any typechecking, it didn't build an AST, it didn't need immutable data structures etc.

> Typically when a person is typing into the editor the code is in a broken state (incomplete variable name, missing semi colon, maybe an open but no close parenthesis etc). What I did was look around what part is being edited and using the previous 'build' (when a user saves or ask the compiler to build), I would look up vars and type names. There's no need to rebuild everything on every keystroke. Maybe you can do it on a newline if you really wanted to but midsentence sounds like a bad place to try and you're not really gaining anything from compiling/parsing a single line change



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: