Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're conflating the two concepts sorry, there is using new technologies to make art, I totally see the merit and value in this. Then there is making money from other peoples work, making a knock off machine.

A service exists which allows people to rip off other artists work and pass it off as their own and hide that fact in the fact it's "generated".

Some artists styles are so prolific, so great that if you're just lazily having ChatGPT generate that for you then using it for commercial gain, or not crediting them, that's theft in my view.

I'm not talking about new technologies that enable new types of art, I'm talking about a platform that enables mass scale rips offs.

I'd feel completely different about it if artists were able to lend their art works to the training model voluntarily for training and even receive some royalties overtime. In fact, I think that's a pretty cool business idea.



I don’t think I’m conflating anything. What I’m saying is that the tool is there now, and while it can be used to blatantly rip off other people’s work, the tool can also be used creatively, and in a way that doesn’t rip anyone off.

So while the ripping off isn’t great, that’s something which can be fixed, and you’ve given a great suggestion on how to do so. But in the meantime, the tech is advancing, and digging in our heels isn’t an option. The upside is far too great to society imo. The legal and social environment will normalize around it, but it isn’t going away.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: