Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agreed on your points. I particularly like, "If it can serve data, it will serve data." Totally get that point of view.

I fully wish that Intel would have gone with the "opt in" approach. Either opt-in with choices in architecture, or opt-in with the option disabled by default. It's the "always there, you don't see it, you can't disable it" thing that's the problem. Intel messed up here, for sure.

But the idea of the Intel Management Engine is sound and extremely useful. And it's the visceral (possibly unsubstantiated) attack against it in discourse that's the thing I'm addressing.

I mean, truthfully, maybe the only way to change things anymore is to be overly loud and exaggerate about issues, basically black & white arguments without any middle ground. Maybe social media has brought us to this point, where we can't see issues as both positive and negative. It kind of starts to sound like our politics, in this way. So maybe the only thing that could possibly change how the IME is configured or deployed is to be a huge stinker about it and make large noise. Sad, but that's probably the case.



> I fully wish that Intel would have gone with the "opt in" approach.

Even a sensible opt-out approach would be better than what we have today, we're simply stuck with it whether we like it or now.

I think that's what makes most people disregard the fleet management aspect and leap towards the conspiracy angle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: