Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why do believe a twitter post that you haven't verified, but you disbelieve someone who tested this?

I already did an ebay chat before I commented. Doing that I saw that my comments were always on the right. That's what I wrote in my comment that you replied to. My chat was on the desktop browser version.

Ebay may have a different chat mechanism that works like the twitter post, but the ones I've tried do not work that way.

Given that, the twitter post and the reddit you linked appear to be people poorly spoofing ebay chats.



I didn’t disbelieve you. You didn’t mention desktop browser, and that was only my guess. The link I posted also was just one example, image search yields more examples. What I provided is likely evidence that Ebay chats can indeed look like that.

Here is another example (about two thirds down the page): https://www.autods.com/blog/dropshipping-tips-strategies/inc... Why would that blog article fake an ebay chat? Why would all the examples fake the chat in the same way?


> Here is another example (about two thirds down the page): https://www.autods.com/blog/dropshipping-tips-strategies/inc...

That's a good find. It's possible that these are from a different chat mechanism or are old. I put more stock in that page than I do for a post on reddit or twitter. Your page has quite a bit of explanatory background information, unlike the social media posts.

This is how desktop chat appears for me. https://ibb.co/WzLH6Yg . The blue Hello box on the right is my typing, which shows a definite difference from what is shown on the Twitter post. I used ibb to upload the image, since it was the first google result for uploading images.


That screenshot looks like a mobile UI though.


It's not, though. Here's a wider version showing the browser heading and tabs.

https://ibb.co/fdg7Qhz


> Why do believe a twitter post that you haven't verified, but you disbelieve someone who tested this?

This is a strange statement. You're a 100% anonymous HN commenter. Nobody has "verified" your comment either. It's just your word and nothing else.

The linked tweet is from someone who is much — as in infinitely — more known than you.

The reason to believe the tweet is simple: Occam's razor. It could be an elaborate hoax, but what would be the motive for that?


Isn't that the point, though? It's easy to verify how ebay chat works. Then, there won't be a need for appeals to authority, comparing people's reputations as "verification", or other logic errors.


> It's easy to verify how ebay chat works.

It's actually not. I just signed in to my ebay account for the first time in a long time, and I had to verify by both email and SMS before I could do anything, which is a pain and made me regret this whole endeavor. And it turned out that I never needed to contact ebay support, so I had no chat transcripts.

Moreover, this assumes there's only one way that ebay chat works, when there are multiple platforms, browsers, apps, etc.


I already wrote twice that there could be a different chat mechanism, so there is no need to keep telling me that there could be more than one chat mechanism. Please read before posting. To illustrate my point, I also uploaded a similar looking chat that is visually reversed in my sibling comment. At first and even second glance, when people don't carefully read first, it may not be easy to see.


> It's easy to verify how ebay chat works.

> I already wrote twice that there could be a different chat mechanism

In other words, it's not so easy.

Now that you've resorted to condescension, I'm done here.


That makes no sense. You were repeatedly telling me what I had already written. Pointing that out isn't condescension.

Anyway, I was simply pointing out that when I use ebay chat on phone or desktop it looks different from what appears to be a fake chat on twitter. Sorry, for your taking that the wrong way. I hope you have a nice day.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: