Huh, so per the last paragraph, they're paying a ton to have an SLA, all the ISP has to provide is basic connectivity because BGP and stuff is being done by the customer themselves, and yet they have more outages in a few months than I have on a consumer connection in years?
The whole thing has a lot of hack value, it's cool and also worth something to be in control of your own networking, even if it's more expensive. Like buying apple: overpriced for the specs you're getting, but you're assured it'll be good quality (that's the idea anyway) and it looks cool (to most). Except... apparently it's still got issues, regularly? Now I'm really wondering what the point was, at least with hindsight
The post said that consumer connection does not let you do BGP peering with the ISP.
There are real value in doing so in addition to the hack value, by doing so you can steer the Internet traffic to whatever IP blocks you owned to your house, dynamically. For example OP mentioned "add some resilience" as motivation, i.e. anytime their services running in the DC failed he can reroute the traffic to ... their house.
You're absolutely feeling the same problems on consumer connections. With DIA, you're the only subscriber on that circuit, so if upstream is having a problem then your neighboring consumers will have them too.
Lower bandwidth dedicated circuits can often "feel" faster than a higher bandwidth consumer connection.
The whole thing has a lot of hack value, it's cool and also worth something to be in control of your own networking, even if it's more expensive. Like buying apple: overpriced for the specs you're getting, but you're assured it'll be good quality (that's the idea anyway) and it looks cool (to most). Except... apparently it's still got issues, regularly? Now I'm really wondering what the point was, at least with hindsight