Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> No DAW ever edits an audio file (except for a few specific operations where the user explicitly requests that).

This feels like semantics. No self-respecting DAW will overwrite your source files, but the DAW's project file is, technically, an audio file. And here's a 30-second video file:

  A = BlankClip()
  B = A.Subtitle("Hello, world!")
  Dissolve(A, B, 30)
(Modified from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AviSynth&oldid=11...)

You're using "audio file" in a domain-specific way. The common meaning of "audio file" is "a file that contains audio": a .aup file is an audio file, just the same as a GarageBand project is, to a room full of 14-year-old amateur musicians.



when i was a 14 (or even 12) year old amateur musician it was very obvious to me that DAW projects weren't audio files, I have never ever seen anyone saying this except your post across all my childhood friends who were dabbling with "artisanal" versions of FL studio, cubase SX, etc etc


The people I'm referring to were using GarageBand, MIDI, wav, mp3, and Musescore in the same kinds of sentences, and talked about converting between them. They also talked about importing into Sibelius and GarageBand. "Convert it [Musescore] to Sibelius" feels like it was about as common as "import the [Musescore] file into Sibelius". (And no, they hadn't heard of Lilypond.) Maybe I misunderstood what they meant. They were predominantly "play on an actual physical instrument"-type people, not tracker enthusiasts: without adult influence, perhaps two people present would have been using computer software at all. (Manuscript paper for everyone, except the one kid who only knew tab.)

Regardless, seems I'm the one with the uncommon use of language, here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: