> sending a text message to offer a financial incentive to do something trivial to help avoid an inefficient waste of resources
It might not be trivial. As the article notes, the main thing that ends up needing to be "shifted" (a misnomer, as we'll see in a moment) is residential air conditioning. But you can't "shift" air conditioning. What "shifting" actually means here is "leaving your A/C off and letting your house warm up". Some people can withstand that without much problem; but some can't (for a variety of reasons). For the ones that can't, running their A/C is not "an inefficient waste of resources", it's a necessity.
1. Eligibility and Program Opt-outs (figure out who it is legal to send the message to)
2. Machine Learning to predict the ROI - how much to offer and how many people are likely to "advertise" to - the utility needs to know so they can keep within budget.
3. What effective, A/B tested messaging to send (some people care about money back, some cared about being green, some both)
4. What medium the customer reacted to (we did batch, usps snail mail - generate PDFs and automated the mailing while minimizing postage cost, or did they react to SMS)
5. The actual platform to blast out texts to all residential customers 24hrs before the DR (Demand Response) event to a city - ex: (BGE) boston, tokyo, PGE (bay area)..
You can shift air conditioning, to a degree. You could cool down the house, maybe even one or two degrees under your usual temperature. Your house now acts as a thermal battery and you can leave the AC off for some time. How long will that work? With the general atrocious insulation in Japan and the very humid/hot summers, probably not super long.
Of course not super on topic but the insulation in central Japan seems to be a big problem to me. Walls are thin and often made out of wood. There are ventilaton holes, often closeable, but with the thinnest plastic cover. Windows are single pane, and the window frames and doors are often of such shoddy construction, you can see the outside through some cracks. If there was a shift in construction quality, I'm sure the electricity use in summer and winter would drop, but I don't expect that to happen soon. Insulation and construction quality is expensive, so this isn't done in construction of rental apartments.
Not very long in any house, if the day is sunny. If the day is cloudy, you might squeeze some more time out. The main heat load on a house in the summer is the sun.
The inefficient waste of resources being discussed wasn't on the demand side, but rather on the generating side. It would be far better to shed the load, instead of firing up less efficient (i.e. wasteful) peaker units.
It might not be trivial. As the article notes, the main thing that ends up needing to be "shifted" (a misnomer, as we'll see in a moment) is residential air conditioning. But you can't "shift" air conditioning. What "shifting" actually means here is "leaving your A/C off and letting your house warm up". Some people can withstand that without much problem; but some can't (for a variety of reasons). For the ones that can't, running their A/C is not "an inefficient waste of resources", it's a necessity.