Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think would have been understandable if he'd grabbed all the required ids from table one and done some kind of where in() with those ids on table two. But the way he did it, if table one returned 100 rows, then he'd be making 101 queries to the database. Don't think I could ever understand that :S


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: