It's not ironic. It's literally the point of why he's calling it "mission-focused" and not "apolitical." If the almost all members of the NAACP happened to be pro-crypto, do you it's reasonable for it's members to pressure its leadership to spread the adoption of crypto?
you missed my point. i'm arguing that coinbase is in the business of pushing their own politics, via cryptocurrency, which is very much a political thing at this point. yet, their workers can't discuss other politics. it's very ironic and hypocritical.
and yes, i think the members of NAACP would be pushing crypto if that's what they felt was a priority for their cause. i don't understand your logic?
edit: i believe that being apolitical is just as a political stance as being political.
two things:
1. the NAACP is political activist organization, not a charity.
2. i'm not sure this is sound logic. if the NAACP sees something as advancing black people, then why can't they advocate for that?
