The people at Facebook are peers you don’t know. Not figuring them into the model, but figuring everyone you do, is poor threat modeling.
People’s threat model is to protect their physical/literal life. Without it, as far as we know, emergent emotional ideas of threats is nothing to be bothered with.
Death isn’t to be feared. I’ve been medically dead. It’s just blank. It’s pressure humans bring at scale to have their work externalized into easy to use tools that freak me out. How easily they seem to be willing to dismiss threats of human behavior
So long as society stays stable they’re the least of my concern while billions are destroying the environment. But they are part of a real threat at scale.
The pandemic response in action right here: this thing that will grow into a problem isn’t a problem. My stable neighbors, when measured by their activity of routinely going to a job, are the real threat.
Yeah that’s true but not at the scale you’re imagining it.
Pretending we should, at scale, explicitly model protectionism for all those private customization is a fools errand.
Let’s customize social protection for shared biological traits, and let people wank their specialness in private. Oh, but we have to live like the romantic stories old people carry forward. Where external social pressures rule us.
What’s the point of carving up data into pools generated by any one person except when scientifically interesting? Oh right to build my custom little emotional castle.
It’s people like us, instigating others to give their special details to our DBs over empty false promises of something special occurring at scale if they do.
How anyone smart doesn’t see the obvious parallel to religion there, I don’t know.
You’re not owed a cool tech job while someone else grows your potatoes. You should include the pressure you put on people that don’t owe you personally in your threat model
People’s threat model is to protect their physical/literal life. Without it, as far as we know, emergent emotional ideas of threats is nothing to be bothered with.
Death isn’t to be feared. I’ve been medically dead. It’s just blank. It’s pressure humans bring at scale to have their work externalized into easy to use tools that freak me out. How easily they seem to be willing to dismiss threats of human behavior
So long as society stays stable they’re the least of my concern while billions are destroying the environment. But they are part of a real threat at scale.
The pandemic response in action right here: this thing that will grow into a problem isn’t a problem. My stable neighbors, when measured by their activity of routinely going to a job, are the real threat.
Yeah that’s true but not at the scale you’re imagining it.
Pretending we should, at scale, explicitly model protectionism for all those private customization is a fools errand.
Let’s customize social protection for shared biological traits, and let people wank their specialness in private. Oh, but we have to live like the romantic stories old people carry forward. Where external social pressures rule us.
What’s the point of carving up data into pools generated by any one person except when scientifically interesting? Oh right to build my custom little emotional castle.
It’s people like us, instigating others to give their special details to our DBs over empty false promises of something special occurring at scale if they do.
How anyone smart doesn’t see the obvious parallel to religion there, I don’t know.
You’re not owed a cool tech job while someone else grows your potatoes. You should include the pressure you put on people that don’t owe you personally in your threat model