Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This makes an interesting counterpoint to "Confessions of a Book Pirate (2010)".

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21786747

Individuals duplicating content without taking from the creator is viewed less acceptable than manufacturers, or more accurately, retailers, deliberately destroying perfectly serviceable physical product.



> Individuals duplicating content without taking from the creator is viewed less acceptable than manufacturers, or more accurately, retailers, deliberately destroying perfectly serviceable physical product.

By whom? I don't think this is true at all.

It's less acceptable to the sellers of said goods, not to society at large.

The legal system doesn't represent the will of the people in all cases; in the case of copyright law it's quite obviously weighted more towards representing the will of money.


No one would want to create content. So in a backwards way, we want content, so it's our will to have copyright law. If you can suggest another way we can have shows like Dexter I think you should speak up.


I think that the society with no copyright law is better, so I'd give up Dexter for it.

It's erroneous to just picture the same world with paid media missing and nothing else sprouting up.


Indeed, and I think that those who want Dexter should figure something out between themselves and whoever can produce Dexter for them, instead of imposing laws that affect everyone in the country or world (including those who want to have nothing to do with Dexter).

I'm sure if enough people want Dexter and are willing to pay for it, they'll get it, even without copyright law.


> I'm sure if enough people want Dexter and are willing to pay for it, they'll get it, even without copyright law.

This seems like an overly naive way of thinking, see Prisoner's Dilemma as a starting point.


Given that 1) I have no idea what Dexter is and 2) copyright most often stands between me and works which would have been public domain under the terms extant at the time of their authorship and publication, I'm more than willing to make this trade.

Even Dexter fans may submit that it's not the author + 70 years or 90 year corporate copyright term that is essential for its creation, but rather the revenues made possible through exclusive rights to advertising and subscriptions in the first few years of release.


How about Star Wars?


By whom?

Well, the eyes of the law, for starters, and all that that includes and implies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: