Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I conducted reasearch on the proposed enterprise in the 1980s. A goal, and the primary one evident in the literature, was manganese nodule mining. Producing manganese.

I don't have my original references handy, but some citations:

https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/0143008

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160932778...

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03354283



The market price of cobalt now is around $38/lb.

The market price of Mn ore is about $0.01/lb of contained Mn.

A good Mn nodule might contain 1% cobalt. It would be really stupid to mine these things for their manganese. Of course you'd sell what Mn you could, but that's not the value proposition here.


Show me the contemporary (1970s) references stating cobalt, not manganese, was the primary goal.

Keep in mind: this was a cover story. It needn't be rational, merely plausible.


I can show you historical price data on the price of cobalt vs. the price of manganese ore. If anything, the price ratio was even higher back then.

https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5188/sir2012-5188.pdf




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: