this strongly reminds me of the hn post from five days back in which the main thread talked at some length about a very similar scenario
> "He missed a big one: you have no way to stop Linux distributions from hacking up your software, and you'll suffer the consequences of whatever they do."
"respectful" as in let's wait years for a maintainer to come up with a solution and when we try to propose our own the maintainer trows a fit and turns it down?
Eh. Although we don't always do things perfectly, Fedora has a pretty strong policy of working with upstreams first.
By contrast in my personal experience as a developer of something that got packaged in Debian, I discovered later that that package had a bunch of patches added, a man page written (!) and so on, none of which was bad, but also none of which was fed back to me at all.
(In case not obvious: I work for Red Hat on Fedora.)
> "He missed a big one: you have no way to stop Linux distributions from hacking up your software, and you'll suffer the consequences of whatever they do."
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19935648