If it was defendant friendly, they'd grant more summary judgement motions than most courts. They don't. They grant less.
The graph difference is that they split the summmary judgement outcome more on both the positive and negative side (IE they grant in part, deny in part).
It's hard to say more than that (because people who file in each court may file more types of claims, etc. So outside of the two extremes, which is grant in full or deny in full, it's hard to say whether the outcomes were "right")
However, you can see ED Tx is plaintiff friendly by far.
https://www.bna.com/rural-texas-judge-n57982086954/
If it was defendant friendly, they'd grant more summary judgement motions than most courts. They don't. They grant less.
The graph difference is that they split the summmary judgement outcome more on both the positive and negative side (IE they grant in part, deny in part).
It's hard to say more than that (because people who file in each court may file more types of claims, etc. So outside of the two extremes, which is grant in full or deny in full, it's hard to say whether the outcomes were "right")
However, you can see ED Tx is plaintiff friendly by far.