I am not doubting science. I am doubting popularly reported science. Go look up the ads where doctors recommended certain brands of cigarettes. I saw an ad from the 50s showing a spoon full of lead additive and claiming it was safe enough to eat. The list goes on...
It's not the facts presented, it the ignored facts, or the twisted presentation that I object to.
My brother worked for Red Bull, where he knew in detail which ingredients affected the body in which way. And it was pretty much all bad, unless you just didn't think so, or you believed your boss.
Also, I am not disagreeing with you. I am pointing out that the bar for your argument is much lower than you think.
It's not the facts presented, it the ignored facts, or the twisted presentation that I object to.
My brother worked for Red Bull, where he knew in detail which ingredients affected the body in which way. And it was pretty much all bad, unless you just didn't think so, or you believed your boss.
Also, I am not disagreeing with you. I am pointing out that the bar for your argument is much lower than you think.