>> This applies to all ML work, why is Watson exempt from it?
>I'm not following, Watson was most assuredly not exempt from it.
Apologies, I meant it as not having clean data with badly tuned models should be obvious root cause of failure to the analysts who are familiar with this industry. As in it may take more work over time to improve the situation, and that this problem occurs commonly in other areas of AI/ML as well.
>> Conversely if this the canonical failure case, why's everyone so harsh on Watson?
>Because they were attempting to use Watson to help make potentially life-and-death decisions?
I'm not following, Watson was most assuredly not exempt from it.
> Conversely if this the canonical failure case, why's everyone so harsh on Watson?
Because they were attempting to use Watson to help make potentially life-and-death decisions?