> I don't think it is a straw-man to point at a real problem and demand answers. A straw-man argument is creating something that doesn't exist then attacking that.
"You are shifting the blame" is a straw man because the GP didn't do that. Rather, it pointed out a nuance in the issue that the previous comment didn't acknowledge.
(And a nit: a straw man attacks an argument that was not made, not a thing that doesn't exist.)
> He didn't call them evil, you are accusing him of doing that (You are closer to constructing a straw-man than he is).
Read my comment again. I said "a lot of rhetoric does X," which is vastly different from "you are doing X."
"You are shifting the blame" is a straw man because the GP didn't do that. Rather, it pointed out a nuance in the issue that the previous comment didn't acknowledge.
(And a nit: a straw man attacks an argument that was not made, not a thing that doesn't exist.)
> He didn't call them evil, you are accusing him of doing that (You are closer to constructing a straw-man than he is).
Read my comment again. I said "a lot of rhetoric does X," which is vastly different from "you are doing X."