> I've been told that card processors will get charged more going forward if they don't implement the chips, or for non-chip transactions because of the added risk involved.
This is true. It's also weird, since really they should be charging less for chip-and-pin, not more for magstripes. By moving to chip-and-pin they immediately release themselves from the hook for card theft, moving the liability to the card holder. The high transaction costs in card networks have historically been defended as largely stemming from fraud costs. Yet, we're expected to pay the same fees.
It's a good time to be in the card processing business.
This is true. It's also weird, since really they should be charging less for chip-and-pin, not more for magstripes. By moving to chip-and-pin they immediately release themselves from the hook for card theft, moving the liability to the card holder. The high transaction costs in card networks have historically been defended as largely stemming from fraud costs. Yet, we're expected to pay the same fees.
It's a good time to be in the card processing business.