Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It was actually Ward. I agree that single linkage would have performed better, however the noise would have greatly confused the issue. Robust Single Linkage (Chaudhuri and Dasgupta, 2010) would be the better choice in the presence of noise as with the test dataset (which was designed to be as difficult as possible for clustering algorithms, while being obvious to a human viewer.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: