This makes perfect sense to me, and I agree. The crowd that was protesting is just a bunch of 20-something hipsters who see rioting and revolution in the rest of the world and want in on the fun.

If you threaten the life of a police officer, expect to be shot. That's all there is to it. These people are just looking for something to cry over.

To people saying BART did this to prevent bad PR: I'm not convinced of this. Everyone knows that doing this would cause an uproar, simply based on the fact that they get their panties in a bunch over acceptable police action.

If you want to protest, go to the streets. You don't have to clog up commuters' travel and make their day shitty. Kmart doesn't have to let you congregate inside their stores. BART doesn't have to let you congregate in the paid area.

Also, I think it's a bit ridiculous that people can write off any claim if it has to do with safety. You guys really think that it would be safe to have protesting in a train station?

>If you threaten the life of a police officer, expect to be shot. That's all there is to it.

If that's what actually happened, sure, but it's interesting that they refuse to release video of the event.

http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-07-05/bay-area/29737621_1_ba...

True, or buy a $15 webcam

You're right. However, it's not fair for you to say that they just chose not to implement it. You don't know that. (unless you have some insider info)

While yeah it's not like they lack the ability to add the feature, it's entirely possible that they have been focusing their attention elsewhere and possibly just haven't gotten around to it.

> don't ship the fucking thing then

I thought IE9 was still a work in progress?

The IE9 Release Candidate has shipped. They are done adding features.

Which blackberry do you have?

8500 series

I would have guessed San Francisco.