Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vojtapol's commentslogin

Yes. Americans/Canadians famously can't pour beer properly. If you are pouring a pilsner or really any lager, a head of at least 2 inches is actually correct and absolutely desirable. The way it's poured in Canada (no head) is borderline undrinkable to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dggKezrSQxI


Preferences vary on both sides of the Atlantic. Another comment on this post complains that Americans pour beer wrong because they _do_ pour with a head.

> Also in the US (probably due to lack of training and the customer too embarrassed to complaining) tend not to fill it the brim (and so not even 16''). I've seen 2-3 inch heads and asked them to top it up. They look at me as if I've just insulted George Washington


If an establishment wants to serve drinks with a head they should use glasses with a mark on the side indicating the measure, rather than glasses which need to be brim full. Using the latter style of glass and including a head is just ripping off the customer.

We call that kind of beer without any head "dead". Measurement here is about two fingers width, and if you do it the first time and screw up it is two fingers in length (second part is of course tounge-in-cheek).

How do you measure the head through the red solo bubba cup?

Really, no self-respecting Canadian would drink beer out of anything except directly out of the bottle, can, or keg.


As a Canadian: hard agree. Beer without head is gross.

If I get a beer with no head I'm assuming the glass was dirty

You should try the Dutch!

They think a big head means a good lager and every pint you get is 80% head.


MCP needs to be supported during the training and trained into the LLM whereas using CLI is very common in the training set already. Since MCP does not really provide any significant benefits I think good CLI tools and its use by LLMs should be the way forward.


This is very developer centric. While Github might have good CLI, there's absolutely no point in having most services develop CLIs and have their non-technical users install those. Not only is it bad UX, but it's bad from security perspective as well. This is like arguing that Github shouldn't have GraphQL/Rest api since everyone should use the CLI.


That's just straight up not true. The $3bn were never meant to fund the entire project in the way you imply.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: