Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tjwebbnorfolk's commentslogin

I remember the Cisco (!!) table was the most popular table at the campus job fair, and they turned away anyone without a 3.8+ GPA. I had a 2.42 (2.40 was minimum degree requirement).

Dodged a bullet there. I've worked happily at a FAANG for many years now and somehow I've avoided living in a cardboard box by a dumpster.


In Virginia, I had never heard of the ACT until I got to college

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but every job interview is a derivative IQ test. That includes leetcode.

Over-reliance on a single LLM is probably not a good idea, no matter who owns it.

VMWare was run on local infrastructure long before the cloud existed.

exactly, I had a 220v 30a circuit installed to run a multi-GPU server in my basement.

I'm air cooling so I set -pl 450 so I'm not running them all at the full 600w


AI and budgets don't mix well at the moment

A ton of cloud workloads are still running on old Haswell-era CPUs with RAM that was bought a decade+ ago. Probably the costs will be made up with new VM shapes.

So if someone invents a cure for all cancer that costs $1 to make, and they sell it for $2, in your world the value created by the inventor is only the profit from the vaccines that person *personally* manufactures themself? That's an insane and backward world that I'm glad we don't live in.

Hot take but people should be paid for working instead of ripping off people with cancer because they got to call dibs on intellectual "property".

They have places like that. It’s called my dad’s village in Bangladesh. The only way to make money is through labor, just like you want. But it turns out that, without capital, the only labor there is to do is farming rice.

"Ripping people off"? I think you'd enjoy living in the Soviet Union which existed in exactly this kind of backwardness.

In this example, someone has come up with a way to build houses $50k more efficient than someone else. Otherwise, they wouldn't be at a competitive price that includes a $50k *profit* per house. (profit = the price of efficiency).

So a person figuring out how to scale their homebuilding methodology by teaching others and providing the *capital* with which they can implement that methodology isn't worth anything to you? I can't imagine a society that could work without these features -- we'd all be re-learning best practices every generation because there'd be no incentive to scale up ideas that work.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: