Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tinybeagle's commentslogin

There are some proposals that use mechanisms like Harberger tax to combat squatting. https://discuss.ens.domains/t/highlight-robin-hansons-more-o...


For DNS, does that mean that if Facebook wants any domain I own, like my homepage for the last 20 years, they'll just get it?

Because an amount of money I can afford to protect it is tiny compared to FB's marketing budgets.


You don’t necessarily need to store DNS changes into the blockchain. The blockchain will only keep the current state and would prune the changes. According to Diode’s blog posts, 20kb of storage is all it needs with BlockQuick, the newly developed light-client protocol.

The point is less about storing the audit history, but more about preventing Man-in-the-Middle attacks and solving the timestamp-certificate chicken-egg problem.


Yes, DNS-on-blockchain would likely make lookups orders of magnitude slower than they are now -- it's making a trade-off between security and performance.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: