Reminds me that the reasoning behind austerity came from an Excel calculation that didn't include all the relevant rows :~/

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/18/uncovered-e...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22223190

https://theconversation.com/the-reinhart-rogoff-error-or-how...

Well, the main issue here seems to be that their work has not been peer reviewed ?

My approach to this is giving companies a place to start these kinds of discussions with people - https://www.somewhere.com/for-companies

Not people analytics or people ops, but a way to talk about how you think about and approach work.

Totally agree, the hard problem in all of this isn't people analytics or people ops, it's people. Dealing with them is hard because we're all so different.

I would humbly point in the direction of Somewhere.com

That's the feeling I'm getting as a result of this. I think it's great that Instagram took a long time before they launched this, and I'm not sure what tools people have in order to report, block and hide ads, but it's clear from this experience it's something the community wants.

Personally, there's no "may" in it. It's all about the people, and what you can do for them. Technology like the internet is just a distribution channel, a few to reach people who aren't nearby.

For actual careers advice from real people, not the looking-back-from-my-yacht type, try https://www.somewhere.com.

Yes, I'm the founder, but this is what we do best - asking questions about work and getting responses from people who are right there, right now, e.g.

https://www.somewhere.com/provocations/latest

It looks pretty and all. How is it different from LinkedIn? I'm always weary getting myself on another "social network" thing instead in the end getting my data sold - or worse - stolen. (actually I'm not sure which is worse...)

I could talk a lot about how we're different from LinkedIn, and how looking pretty as a website is a hindrance at times, but we're less about what you've done and more about how you do it.

For a lot of people things like job titles and descriptions are out of sync with what we do, and we don't really have any good tools to show or share our work. Developers have Github, designers have dribbble, but for everyone else there's not a good tool out there.

But, I hear you on the YASN problem, and we're not solely a social product as a result of that.

I got bored of London, worked in SF for a while and enjoyed it there, but had no chance getting a visa.

I got back to London (could never really afford to live in the city centre) and then moved to Berlin and loved it. But, you can get too comfortable in some places, so I'm back in London again, but I miss Berlin.

Never go back though, if I had the chance I'd move on to somewhere new in Europe for sure. London's great though, more diversity than many, many places, and that's a huge reason to stay.

Very cool - small thing, there's a spello in the footer "We have helped place candidates at top technoogy companies and startups." Bigger thing, software jobs are pretty much all jobs, or do you mean tech jobs? Either way I like it, nice one!

Snap -- will be in the next push.

We can help people understand the skills for all ranges of software jobs, but prioritize people looking in tech.

Another typo - "Thus, if you're base offer is $100k" - should be "your" :)

Also, "where you're at" is poor grammar. You could simply say "where you are." In general, you should probably avoid contractions (say "you are" instead of "you're").

Good luck!

"Engineering hiring isn’t a filtering problem. It’s a sourcing problem." Yes and all hiring is a sourcing problem, when it comes down to it.

There are so many recruitment companies are out there on the horizon, especially in London right now.

It's a big space to dive into and a lot of people assume that they can tech their way out of it, but it takes a lot more than a fancy algorithm and a joint dislike of shitty recruiters to be useful.