Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | specialist's commentslogin

How do laypersons (noobs) like me learn about this stuff? Like Wired magazine technical level.

I've just started Darknet Diaries podcast. So great.

When I worked on electronic medical records, I assumed it was just a matter of time until we were hacked (too). All the most banal reasons: many vendors, shared passwords, root/admin access, etc.

I imagine things haven't improved much since.


Darknet Drinking Game: a shot every time something is “unbelievable to me”

Last gig I had that took QA/Test seriously was late '90s. I have no hopes the situation will improve, for quality or security, until something fundamental changes.

> without adopting a rationalist identity

Aha: "identity". You nailed the misgivings I couldn't articulate. Thank you.


Contact McNeel and ask. Email Bob some examples of your work. Definitely include some/all of your unpublished book.

Bob is how I got started in CAD. As a student, I pestered him until he found me a job (at one his clients).


TLDR: Michael Gibson is the brain child for Rhino3D's UI.

Yup. I know some of this story.

It's been a minute, so I forget some details...

Ages ago, Robert McNeel & Assoc had been working on the geometry kernel for years. They had high value customers who needed very correct results, not available (from other kernels) at the time. By that time, being a VAR, McNeel had experience with most commercial offerings.

Not having their own front end, they had to import/export to other CADD systems. One of their motivations for reverse engineering AutoCAD's DWG format.

McNeel stumbled onto Sculptura. A mesh modeler written by a solo dev. As I remember it, Sculptura's UI was innovative, amazing, and norm breaking. Exactly what McNeel was looking for. They bought it asap. (Gods, I wish I could quickly remember that guy's name.)

McNeel's intent was to synthesize Sculptura's UI and their state of art kernel.

McNeel had the dual luxury of time and no installed base (legacy). Their initiative motivation was a correct kernel. Like correctly joining 3 curving surfaces. (Their canonical example at the time was to accurately model a styrofoam egg carton.) Which took years of R&D.

So they had time to really nail Rhino3D's UI.

Aha. I just found the official history. My memory wasn't too far off.

https://www.rhino3d.software/the-history-of-rhino-3d/

Michael Gibson! Yay! I now recall him grinding away on Rhino. Whenever I visited McNeel, he loved giving demos, talking about ideas, etc. Great guy. (We were both young, surrounded by olds, so had that connection.)


I grew up in Seattle and attended West Seattle High School. The technology teacher (whose name I forget, but I can remember his face and voice!) decided to teach us Rhino3d. That went on to me talking about Rhino on Slashdot one day and a digital book publishing startup noticed my comment, and eventually offered me a job of writing a book about Rhino.

I actually haven't used Rhino for much of anything for decades now, I think the last time I used it was to build a scale model of my old town home. I cannot really justify spending $1000 on a program that I would only boot up once every few months for fun. But I have kept love for it all these years, every time I have started it up (downloaded a trial to get some particular task done) I was able to continue right where I left off making things.


What's your (hot) take on Starship's second stage reusability?

My (noob) understanding is the challenge is achieving reuse (safety, reliability) while keeping the (economically necessary) 100 ton payload capacity.


My guess is Tesla's pivoting to batteries and storage. Huge demand, great margins, competitive advantage.

I'm very disappointed Tesla has (seemingly) abandoned its goal of producing 20m Model 2 per year. Forfeiting the mass market is a bummer. More so every passing day.

(I'm bearish on Robotaxi and (Tesla's) self-driving.)


> confronted with a world that doesn't work the way you want it to

Sure.

Some of us are just trying to figure out the new rules. What is all this hypercapitalism stuff (aka Muskism) and who are the people (lunatics) pushing us there?

So it's natural to kibitz about one of the most powerful people on the planet. Especially when he's also a world-striding shit poster, antagonizing everyone, demanding a response.

FWIW: the writings of Jill Lepore, Quinn Slobobian, and Ben Tarnoff have been most illuminating. Ditto their misc guest appearances on various podcasts.

X Man: The Elon Musk Origin Story

https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/elon-musk-the-evening-rocket

Elon Musk Is Building a Sci-Fi World, and the Rest of Us Are Trapped in It Nov. 4, 2021

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/opinion/elon-musk-capital...

Muskism: Guide for the Perplexed

https://www.amazon.com/Muskism-Guide-Perplexed-Quinn-Slobodi...

https://bookshop.org/p/books/muskism-a-guide-for-the-perplex...

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/mar/26/muskism-by-qui...

https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/books/muskism-review-elon...


So you just hate him. Great. Now stop derailing every thread related to NASA/Spacex launches.

Citations, please.

Yes and: If a cable has any faults, of any kind.

I can't believe I'm still swapping cables and ports, trial and error, trying to determine if the cable, the port (eg iPhone's charging port), or both, are failing.

Not knowing the USB specs; I assume each head of a cable can do a loop back test, determine if can even see its other head, etc.


Just so I'm clear: What is Meta's non-criminal business?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: