I don't know about TST, but sidebery can alter your window title when it's active, so you can match css rules against it.

    #main-window[titlepreface*="Sidebery"] #TabsToolbar {
      visibility: collapse !important;
    }

Oh heck! That's rad. I'll have to play around with that. I use sidebery so this is aces. Thank you!

From the web page: Dragonfly is an in-memory data store built for modern application workloads. It is fully compatible with the Redis and Memcached APIs, required no code changes to adopt

What settings and repo are you using for GTX 1050 with 2GB?

I'm using the one I linked in my original post: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

The only command line argument I'm using is --lowvram, and usually generate pictures at the default settings at 512x512 image size.

You can see all the command line arguments and what they do here: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki...

This explained pipewire pretty well to me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxEXMHcwtlI

The short answer is that pipewire reimplements pulseaudio and jack, keeping compatability with both at the same time.

I've been using multipass for a couple months. It's been working well for my use case.

Here are a couple links I found about it: * https://www.cnbeining.com/2021/09/using-docker-and-docker-co... * https://gist.github.com/pmbaumgartner/b08a34f73afcd9b29227a4...

I also recently found out about colima, but haven't tried it out. * https://github.com/abiosoft/colima

Yes and No. They are not mutually exclusive.

I find that generally I'm much more productive in Emacs, so I use it most of the time. But I reach for the IDE when it makes sense.

It's not merely nostalgia or availability. I continue to use emacs because it has the features that I want, where other software does not.

Some things I want out of an editor:

* Never having to touch the mouse in any way.

* The ability to customize any feature for my current project or mindset on a whim.

* No UI, as much as possible. Show me the content I'm editing and nothing else.

* A good, extensible, set of keybindings with a bunch of features for editing of raw text

I run my project in an IDE and will sometimes use a feature, but I generally don't develop there.

The great thing about both Emacs and Vim is that you can "customize any feature." All of the other things you're looking for just naturally flow out of that.

The extensibility of Emacs is a major boon. Here an example: I never did real Emacs hacking, but I learned some Lisp stuff over the years, a bit of Clojure, Racket, and Common Lisp each. Now, I have a very experienced senior coworker which was asking for help - there was a feature which was just not working for his flow, he had tried to configure it but without success. Now, I looked into the Emacs library code and that was a pleasant experience, it is very transparent and readable and easy to modify, so that it was not difficult to adapt it to my coworkers's needs.

The extensibility also means that, because there are many many people hacking on Emacs, that it stays very up-to-date. For example, Magit which is, I think, the best git front-end in existence. Or there is ranger mode, (ranger is a console file manger). In this sense, Emacs is not "antiquated", as the blog article insinuates, but it is much more recent and modern than any IDE. Take, as an example, git support: It took Visual Studio about fifteen years to add git support, in part obviously because the vendor company did not think supporting git was helpful to the companies objectives. In comparison to that, Emacs picked up version control options such as subversion or git almost immediately. As a result, Visual Studio users were left for fifteen years without support for the perhaps most important technical advance in programming. You may now argue, that the "modern" IDEs of course do have support for git, but there are surely other things which will be missing, just because it does not fit some companies narrative or marketing strategy. Another brewing revolution is that programming culture is drifting away from C++ and Java, in parts even from OOP, which is not any more the best option for every case, and companies which are invested in these "technologies" (uh, what a word), will again try to stop the clock, in order to squeeze a bit more money out of it.

I would add to your list of features: it runs from the comfort of the command line, and cleanly inside the terminal.

5) Starts up _right now_, and uses up minimal memory.

I'm another happy enpass user. They are also having a 30% sale on their lifetime plan right now. Works on Windows/Mac/Linux/Mobile.

Reproducibility and peace of mind! There's nothing worse that getting woken up at 3:30 AM and realizing that it'll probably take a few hours to rebuild a server because it's dead and not coming back.

When infrastructure is code, you just spin up a new machine...no thinking involved. Also, since you're used to deploying this way, the process is smooth and as quick possible.

When you build the server by hand...you're often searching around for old ssl certificates, installing packages you forgot were dependencies, etc. Takes a long time to get it right.

If you're skeptical of the cost/benefit of the approach, you realize really quick that it's worthwhile when stuff starts to fail. Especially if it happens more than once.

Zulip is another option. https://zulipchat.com/