Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rmbe's commentslogin

I wonder what the average power draw is.


Good list, though it is missing The Culture series of Iain M Banks.


Fourthing the Culture series.

I've read most of them now and the highlights for me are Look To Windward, Player of Games and Fearsum Endjinn (stick with that one). I also rate Excession and Matter though I know a lot of other people think they're weaker.

Atlas Shrugged has been called the 'second most influential book in America' so I can understand why it gets mentioned a lot. I found it an unimaginative, tacky bore. It's at least three times the length it should be, the characters speak in diatribes and are impossible to empathise with. At best it's interesting as a thought experiment and it did affect my outlook on life but, really, I read it because I thought I should, not because I wanted to.

I also found Red Mars a bit of a struggle in this way too. It seemed similarly ideological to Atlas Shrugged but from the other direction. It was worth reading for the sheer attention to detail and imagination though.


I find it amazing that there still hasn't been a film or TV adaptation of Iain M Banks. Not that such a thing would be necessary or a validation of his writing; but I'd love to see it imagined and realized visually. It's a vision of perhaps the best possible case for the human future - if we don't fuck up.


I'll second the recommendation for The Culture series, and add "A Fire Upon The Deep" by Vernor Vinge.


The Culture series is one of the most uplifting series I've read. When I'm reading it, I'm just smiling thinking "yeah, that's exactly how humans should develop". Also, ships named Well, it works for me.


Thirding The Culture series (I've only read Matter, but I loved the setting) and adding Embassytown by China Miéville.


fifthing. Excession!


It's not a free market because the people sending the money (the customers, in this case) don't get to choose which provider to use.


But when the government privatizes services, that agency problem always exists. Instead of contracting to one service like any other entity, government would always need to contract with several. You're just making a stronger argument for not privitizing government services.

Moreover, laying all the blame at the feet of government for these companies being scumbags is precisely why I said private industry has the wrong culture for this sort of thing.


>Instead of contracting to one service like any other entity, government would always need to contract with several

No, the government is the entity making a selection among several choices, and is the entity in the position to negotiate the rates.

Therefore they could bargain for lower rates if they wanted.

Misrepresenting the choices isn't making your case.


> and is the entity in the position to negotiate the rates.

But Lower rates for whom? Inmates. Why would prison officials care if inmates get lower rates?


Sure, but that's not a failing of the free market, that's a failing of the government.


As far as I can tell, JPay is picked because it's the biggest. Any evidence the competitors wouldn't do the same once they got the contracts?


Write it into the contracts that they cant?

The government is the entity with power here. The government regularly dictates all kinds of terms for their contracts. All the time.


If you read the article you will see that they do it most likely cheaper than the prison can do:

JPay’s rapid rise stems in part from the generous deal it offers many prison systems. They pay nothing to have JPay take over handling financial transfers. And for every payment it accepts in these states — prisoners typically receive about one per month — the company sends between 50 cents and $2.50 back to the prison operator.

The government does have the power, and they most likely are outsourcing this part of their non core infrastructure like most other companies do, to save money.


They will still save money without the kickbacks, which should be illegal as payola.


this one fits too http://xkcd.com/675/


lichess doesn't seem to be giving it enough juice to perform at its stated levels at the moment.

On my first try I managed to draw the highest AI level, rated at 2510, while my rating is under 2000 irl. (I was unable to find an "offer draw" button so relied on the 50-move rule) Against stockfish running on my PC that would be impossible. http://en.lichess.org/reDfuSvI


Have you actually read the article? It's all explained http://en.lichess.org/blog/U4mtoEQAAEEAgZRL/strongest-chess-...


I did. I was complaining about the rated strength of the AI levels, they're off by a wide margin.


India is a sovereign country, their laws don't need to make sense.

EU antitrust fines are also capped at 10% of the total turnover. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/overview/factsheet_f...


I will grant you your first point if you can point me to a specific Indian law that says cartelization fines are a function of a multinational's global sales?

As to your link on EU fines, it very clearly states that fines are a percentage of "relevant sales", defined as "usually the sales of the products covered by the infringement". I don't know how you came to the conclusion that means global sales?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: