> Overall, as with every digital ID thread, it would help if some of the fearmon gering commentators would read the actually EUDI specs for once in their lives

Yeah

I'm getting really really tired of the "crying wolf" crowd

Well I guess Allegra was a bit old already /s

I loved Allegra! Saved me a lot of time when I was writing code for our musicdisk. That was 29 years ago though. :)

The airport needs to know that by themselves as well because it's part of METAR

Now imagine we're can't have this basic resource anymore because some nerd fuckr needs to win a bet on the internet

Makes me want to bet on creative uses of a baseball bat

That's cool

I mean it's like trying to balance a cybetruck into 4 skateboards and flunging it over a hill cool

Honestly this article is mixing a lot of different factors

> Acetaminophen has a scarily narrow therapeutic window. The instructions on the package say it's okay to take up to four grams per day. If you take eight grams, your liver could fail and you could die.

Gee I don't know, I think this is a wide enough window to not miss it. That difference is 8 500mg pills

> that for most people in most circumstances, acetaminophen is safer than ibuprofen, provided you use it as directed. I think most doctors agree with this.

Could be but I think a lot of doctors underestimate the dangers of paracetamol as well

All of the factors the author mentions about IBP are true. But it's all about the details. Safer? Safer in which condition?

"Dehydrated" ok take a glass of water. Active bleeding? Most NSAIDs interfere with that, and no you won't become a hemophiliac by taking one Ibuprofen

Also, some countries do add a notice for kidney problems for Paracetamol as well (e.g.) https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/5164/pil

An as a conclusion, I find it "funny" that nobody considers how healty/safe it is to take paracetamol and have mild analgesia (translation - you're still in pain) and taking ibp and having better analgesia

Funnily enough I've had a "low cost phone" with replaceable batteries (the "old school way")

So it does not seem a big deal

I think the BC548/558 were a bit more popular (though lower voltage) :)

(and I think you had it up to 546 with an ever higher voltage)

> 2Nxxxx just told you that this is some kind of transistor or thyristor, instead of being a diode like 1Nxxxx.

Oooh that's what it means!

But yes the European code makes (a bit) more sense

Though I never used a BS/BU code, only BD and the TIP series which might be a proprietary code