Just for fun. I asked Claude to build an online rater using the rubrics https://yujqiao.github.io/bs-index/

And yes, that IS the expected behavior.

Select to translate is almost a standard feature for translation software. Not sure if the situation gets better now, but back then the software was written, using clipboard as temporary storage is a very robust and maybe the only way to implement such feature.

Trivia: It's likely sending Ctrl+C and reading clipboard to get the selected text. No easy cross-platform API for this lol.

Also note that the software is very old and poorly maintained.

Some context for ppl who are not paranoid, it's a very old software and not very maintained since very long time ago. I'm pretty sure HTTPS was not common at the time. And the selection scanning a very common and wanted feature in many alternatives for windows, browsers, etc.

If there's anything we can learn from it - don't use obsolete software.

what's the benefit of using cgdb while you can use gdb layout src?

Is this another metaphor in the game Superliminal?

For simple use cases, I found animate.css[1] very handy.

[1] https://animate.style/

A blast from the past! I've used animate.css around 2014–15, nice to see it still kicking.

We're talking about a product and you present a story.

The OP I replied to was asking about use cases for an augmented reality product, I listed a few.

Ads can have both persuasive (propaganda) and informative functions.

Informative ads make the market more efficient. Persuasive ads actively make the market less efficient.

Most ads in the US in 2023 seem to be persuasive.

Perhaps the ad industry would become more useful (and smaller) if we managed to effectively regulate it to significantly reduce the persuasive bits.

I think that most people would support this if you explained it right - from the free-market perspective, this would give you a better market.

Agree.Maybe users with sketch in their hand are more interested in using this tool. I'm not a designer but I suppose people using Blender/AutoCAD already know what material/style they want.

Sometimes it's really hard to say "damn many prompts" is better than writing on your own.

One of the most frustrating about this approach is that it feels asymptotic, you’re always approaching but never arriving at a solution. You start seeing diminishing returns on further prompting.

It’s great for scaffolding, but not that great for non-trivial end-to-end projects.