What is overhyped about: "A new trick brings stability to quantum operations". Are people complaining about the HN title as if it's the article's title?
If you go to the last (2356th!) page, you will see eight posts from 2023 and 2024, mostly few months apart. (But even none of those are good)
Then in 2025 @nawazdhandala starts going wild with 22 articles on January 6th. And from that point on it's basically just all him and it keeps accelerating.
I'm guessing there is a bit of a feedback loop now since people try this, search for the slopsite and click it, boosting it higher. For me it was top result (in incognito, not personalized).
Two things you can do:
- Navigate back and open another link. This signal is used to downrank for given query (google assumes the site did no provide satisfying answer)
- Explicitly provide result feedback. Unfortunately there isn't a category for "this is slop" but "inaccurate" works.
Every single technical auditor I've dealt with has been majorly incompetent and wanted to do things that would decrease security. And these were not some cheap bottom of the barrel companies but the big "industry leaders".
Push or pull is just semantics. Can you honestly say that you never ever updated anything in a Linux distro without first reading the source code, checking all the checksums etc? Be honest.
Important to correct for, but doesn't invalidate the whole microplastics concern.
reply