There is one bearer that is shared between all the wireless connections in a cell - the EM spectrum. Cells interfere with each other, so if you drop the power and up the frequencies of the cell you can have more cells in the same area but as you go up the frequencies to do that you have problems with things like walls and trees and also you have to have a wired network to provide the backhaul.
Location: boulder, USA
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: possible
Technologies: python/ javascript/ objective c
Resume: Location:
Remote:
Willing to relocate:
Technologies:
Résumé/CV: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qn11IeoCK8HLYPTBapzMEJuJ...
Email: sam.barranco@gmail.com
I am starting a small business. One of the decisions I must account for is network performance versus price. Perhaps I choose to partner with a company that my network deprioritizes. I am already at a disadvantage because I cannot afford to run my own lines or peer like large corporations.
These same corporations can invest or purchase smaller new buisness and enhance their portfolio. Some already support network neutrality as they understand this.
I know my buisness depends upon my own effort. But I am sure many other small buisness owners face the same difficulty.
I know it is hard to be fair and objective in allowing access to the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Thanks for the article.
"Boo hoo it's so hard to do business!" is not going to cut it, I'm afraid. The government and all citizens do not exist to enable you to do business. The policy should be what's right, and it should preferably follow the basic principles of modern society: free market.
Whether NN enables competition or kills it is debatable. But difficulty in business is not a reason.
Imo ISPs shouldn't be allowed to be a free market as they are monopolies. Whether they should be codified as monopolies like electricity/water is debatable. They absolutely should not be treated like a restaurant where you can just go next door if they start screwing you over though.
