That's quite a harsh critique that doesn't seem warranted. There are quite a lot of different examples with varying quality. Granted, it's likely that these are to some extent cherry picked, but it's unlikely that these are rare and that most output sounds like incoherent noise, as you seem to insinuate.
I think we should judge content independently of whether it was created by AI or humans. Labeling AI-free content doesn't seem to add much value to me in general (with exceptions).
e-bot7 is a Munich-based startup that redefines customer service through the integration of artificial intelligence. Our mission is to automate repetitive queries, leaving human agents with more interesting work while collecting data to train increasingly powerful neural networks. Today, we work with large and progressive corporations throughout Europe.
We are looking for Data Scientists experienced in the fields of NLP/NLU and conversational AI. As a member of our team you will have a significant impact on the technical direction of the company. If you are looking for challenges and enjoy working and experimenting with new technologies, we would be happy to meet you!
Is there something similar that is based on Wifi connections instead of bluetooth? Wouldn't that offer a greater range?
Edit: Nevermind, the article explains that firechat does in fact use Wifi in addition to Bluetooth to transmit messages:
From the first IP, I understand that Firechat is also looking to create bond
between WiFi device. It periodically sends UDP packet to the multicast
address 239.192.0.0 and will also forward message just as it does with
bluetooth. So not only every message sent are forwarded by bluetooth, they
are also forwarded by WiFi !
