I have noticed this in GitHub issues too. Where many long paragraphs used to indicate high quality, now it's the opposite.

Yes, the more personal the context, the more the humanity aspect / being relatable matters.

To me the rhythm of the text makes it clear whether I'm reading something AI generated or not, usually.

Otherwise, not using em dashes, adding some mistakes and writing more like how you think/talk helps :)

Good on them. Platforms taking more than 10% feels unjustified and monopolish.

Did you ask it to make money?

Would love to hear from the human behind this AI stuff. What are you making and why?

As builders we should find pride in producing something beautiful. As the norm becomes more shitty, something nice becomes more refreshing.

I wonder if this would work even better by picking a random person of the three and pinning it on them. The bystander effect disappears completely and now there is accountability.

Agreed. On a previous team I was on (no CODEOWNERS there either), we had a Python script in the build process that would look at the git history for the changed files and assign the two most likely people to the pull request automatically. I liked that a lot.

I forced myself to evaluate my own posture whenever I get up. This was difficult at first but comes naturally now. No special tools, just making a strong mental note each time I forget. It's not been working perfectly but pretty well.

I'm sorry.

I do agree with your post. It looks like HR is already impacted a lot by many people applying to many jobs through AI. Imagine filtering through 1000s of AI job applications to find the human who tries their best to sound professional.

I guess in their defense, they are attempting to do something albeit in a way that makes things worse for everyone else.