It’s neat to see more projects adopting Unikernals. I’ve played around with Unikraft’s Cloud offering about a year ago when it was CLI/API only and was impressed by the performance but found too many DX and polish issues to take it to production. Looks like they’ve improved a lot of that since.
Howdy! We are hard at work at improving the DX, and as a result we've been working on a brand new CLI. We haven't made any announcements yet, but it's already open-source for early adopts if you'd like to give it a try!
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that in 1-2 years inference speed with have increased enough to allow for “real time” prompting where the agent finishes work in a few seconds instead of a couple minutes. That will certainly change our workflows. Seems like we are in the dial-up era currently.
It's arguably already here, only cost is a concern. We now have an open weights model - =you can throw as much hardware at it as you want to speed it up - at Sonnet 4.5+ level.
Today Anthropic started offering 3x(?) Opus speed at 5x cost as well.
But then models will do more computation, to be slower.
What will have to change are workflows. Why are you ever waiting for the prompt to return? When you send an email, do you stare at your screen until you get a reply?
I believe they chose a bridge to create a more uniform natural path across the freeway so that the animals will be more likely to utilize it. There’s already an overpass a half mile to the south that would allow a crossing over frontage roads but because it’s not obvious and wild enough, animals still cross on the freeway.
The first sentence is almost completely subjective, and the leading fact in second sentence gives the best evidence against an overpass in this thread. The only thing that is going to make this more obvious to the mountain lions would be a few more dead deer carcasses as a result of the car lights! lets jump off the side into oncoming hidden traffic behavior.
Are you referring to Zelle? I think the issue for users that keeps them on services like Venmo is primarily the UX. The Zelle experience varies depending on the customer’s bank. It’s a service run by and between the banks, who are generally not as user experience-focused as tech companies. One example of this is that there is no feedback when sending money to a phone number that is not on the platform. The funds just go into the void and are returned a couple days later. By contrast, Venmo lets the payer verify the payee with their profile picture, username, and phone number.
No, not zelle. Pay a Person service is popular with credit unions and some banks. Receiver gets a message and inputs his bank account information into a form. Sender never sees that information. After the link has been established, subsequent transfers are just one click.
I receive targeted recruitment ads from the U.S. Army and Navy frequently. Targeted advertising appears to be a valuable tool in encouraging young people to join the military.
> but then lost interest when it refused to do the same thing for boobs.
GTP-4 from the API seems to have no problem with it:
Narrator: (Deep, gruff southern voice)
[Soundtrack: American Roots Rock tune in the background]
(SFX: Eagle's cry)
“Presenting the all-new Boobiemax® Wonder Duo! Crafted with the finesse only Mother Nature could inspire!
These ain't your average pair of breasts. They're like no other, perfect blend of allure and comfort, built for the hardworking women who seize the day. No fabrication - only 100% organic design with ComfortPlush™ technology, defining the balance between aesthetics and luxury…” and so on.
