Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jcliff's commentslogin

On the contrary, it makes a significant difference. Futures have to roll over monthly and there's costs associated with that. Depending on the slope of the futures curve, the costs can be high (10+%). Holding spot bitcoin solves this problem and makes the fund more palatable to advisors and institutions.


This 2015 world time map update is an interesting framing of the ongoing Ukraine war.


sorry, you're still wrong. currency debasement and bitcoin aren't going anywhere.


Currerncy debasement? My dude, $60,000 in Bitcoin in late 2021 is worth only $25,000 today. If debasement is the problem, Bitcoin is not the solution.


brokerages need to have cash on hand to loan. they can partner with a bank, or it can come from their own balance sheet or investors, but it's not printed out of thin air.


In practice, aren't almost all of them either a bank themselves or partner one or more banks and auto-sweep customer deposits into these 'program banks'?

Sure it might be slightly more convoluted, but at the end of the day isn't this still customer deposits funding margin/loans?


In this thread, cynicism from people salty that they didn't invent or collect cryptopunks or bored apes.

I haven't gotten into nfts myself but to say that they are stupid or a scam now comes across as wishful thinking to cover your butt for missing out.

nfts represent ownership over digital culture, like it or not. digital collectibles. the market will decide whether they are priced like banksys or beanie babies.

While many will be a fad, I'm certain some won't be. Other nfts will be as mundane as an event ticket. It's a wide open field, and I think the HN community should try to keep an open mind.


> nfts represent ownership over digital culture

But what is the point of that? If I own a physical or digital item in the non-NFT sense the benefit is that I have the thing. I can use it/look at it/listen to it/play it/whatever.

What use is owning a receipt for something that anyone can freely copy for themselves? Am I supposed to feel good that I have it and someone else doesn’t? I literally don’t understand.

The only arguments I can come up with are enforcement of copyright and supporting artists, both of which can and do happen just fine without involving any sort of blockchain.


Something that I don't think is widely appreciated enough is that Coinbase Ventures holds chunks of many of these startups.


Any specifics I should check out?


well, a partial list of their investments is here: https://ventures.coinbase.com/

Some major ones aren't included such as CoinSwitch Kuber which Coinbase Ventures recently co-led a $260M round.


because nonvoting shares still represent economic ownership of the company. for example, they get pro rata dividends if dividends are ever declared.


without a way to resolve the canonical version without trusting a singular maintainer, git is not a blockchain. blockchains enforce consensus in a decentralized way, at least public blockchains do or should.


Well no, blockchain plus consensus algorithm does what you’re describing.


it's not a blockchain without a consensus algorithm. it's a linked list of hashes.


While I get what you're referring too, you're drawing from a community wisdom definition vs. any clear technical spec deeming it such, which is what I'm highlighting here. Even the whitepaper calls it "a timestamp network."


all of those transactions for $0 are actually distributions to the partners. the shares aren't necessarily sold.


I believe you need to email coinbase@secondmarket.com


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: