Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hootmon's commentslogin

Yet another harangue from a capitalist running dog. Move on nothing new here, nothing to see. We all know immigration is a capitalist codeword for labor exploitation, keep those wages low, benefits nonexistent, and jobs to a minimum, so they will be docile and subservient.


According to this Robber Baron apologist, I am 10 times better off than I was in the 50s. Lets see, my dad, in the fifties could afford from his average salary to buy a new car every 2 years. Guess what in my so called better life, I buy a new car every 15 years. yea thats progress. I think this tool lumps the progress of the top 2% in with the rest of us smucks to come up with his baloney good news. The average wage buys less today than it did years ago, plus the average wage is falling and benefits are disappearing. The good news just keeps coming...


I think this is the case: In the fifties, there were a lot fewer people who were as rich as your dad, than there are people today who are as rich as you. At the same time, more people today want and can afford cars and other expensive things. Thus, even though we are constantly using resources more efficiently, you are competing with more people for resources today than your father in the fifties.

This is natural and a good thing: If Earth can't sustain very many people buying cars every 2 years, then we can't buy new cars every 2 years. We have to use resources more efficiently. It's a similar situation with fuel: For a long time, we built stronger engines that consumed the same amount of fuel, instead of building engines that used less fuel for more efficient use. Later that trend reversed. A similar thing happened with computers and their energy use.

I hope my kids won't have to buy more than one car in their life.


But the car you bought then every two years didn't last as long, wasn't as safe, wasn't as comfortable, got worse gas mileage, didn't accelerate as well, had no power steering, etc.

But I do agree that the middle class is in trouble in America. Today to be middle class you need at least a BS degree or equivalent skills and you have to constantly re-educate, and that bar appears to be rising steadily.


But the car you can buy has more safety and comfort features than the one your dad could buy back then.


Don't make me laugh, cool tech at farcebook... NOT.

Warmed over AOL training wheel walled garden bullcrap is not cutting edge. Whoop De Dooo, its got an API.

Sorry but I left AOL years ago, and guess what, no one cool ever worked for AOL or Farcebook.


Pure Korpo Fascist apologist hack at work here...

Kind of skipped over the whole 'US was founded on the premise of keeping corporations from having citizenship rights'.

Korps in decline, I think not, rights of real people in decline, rights of corporations on the continued rise.


Sorry to burst yer bubbles, but this has all been discounted years ago, mainly by the United States Air Force. They did extensive studies on the optimum work hours/recreation hours and found that strict 9-5, 5 days on, 2 days off, was far more productive and safe than any other configuration.

They won't let you put in more than 40 hrs a week in those multi-billion dollar war planes. Working more than 40 hours a week is counter productive. It increases the likely-hood of bad judgement, cloudy thinking etc will creep into the work.

So the Robber-Baron Korp evil HR types who think they are being cool forcing people to work 40+ hours, are actually just hurting their bottom line.


That sounds like a pretty interesting research I'd like to read more about - can you please provide some citations/ links.


Fascism, the boot that keeps on stomping on your face.

No wonder there is no competition in local markets for internet access or cable.

America, the founding fathers took corporations rights away, whore lawyer Lincoln gave them back in spades, and people have been getting screwed ever since.


All the snobby effete commenters who write off this trend, just wait until enough people are marginalized and they decide to do something about it.



I will never understand why Xerox did not sue the pants off Jobs when he stole 99% of this visual gui design and then claimed forever onward that Apple was responsible for it.

The thing that killed this was at that time no company was going to spend close to the salary of a typist to outfit said typist with this kit. (I believe it was in the 10-20K range.)


Because in exchange for letting Apple engineers visit their research labs for three days, Xerox got a million dollars in pre-IPO Apple stock.


Just consider this. Most tax money goes toward providing defense, Which is just a nice word for protecting the property of the wealthy. The more property you have, then the more value you receive, thus the more, not less, you should pay. Its called welfare for the rich. Our taxes go towards securing their position and goods. Say hello to that boot rushing down on you.


> Most tax money goes toward providing defense

It seems like (FY2010) 20% of Federal expenditures go toward defense, and 58% go to entitlement programs (which (I speculate) the 1% wealthiest do NOT receive disproportionate benefit from).

Source: http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/03/usa-incor... second graph


From that chart, it appears the problem is the healthcare industry is getting too much money. Medicare is expensive along with the tax deduction for health insurance. If we could get down healthcare costs, it would solve the problem.


Perhaps that is taking defense too literally. In this day of age, there is very little threat to people's property from Mexico or Canada.


However, there is ever-present threat to the interests abroad of American individuals and companies.


The title should have been Name Dropping, why I just can't stop...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: