Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hexasquid's commentslogin

This needs to be built into figma and taught to product managers. FE devs are telling each other this all the time (mentioned in every single FE conference), but most of the time

- they don't get to make this decision - they fail when pushing back - Hacker News eventually blames the FE dev


In 20 years of front-end web development I've never encountered a designer willing to use standard form controls. I assume they exist.

"I'm going to put this fire over with the rest of the fire" but in app form

Not what I expected

Same here, I expected an "openclaw powered google glass", leading to a "Black Mirror"-esque world full of glassholes regurgitating LLM output at each other.

Not exactly "heres to the crazy ones" anymore eh

I'm so tired of what initially looks like a perfect normal communication between two people, only to find that some third party has inserted itself like a parasite to exploit and extract human attention. That's why I use our sponsor, nord vpn ...


I'm asking the same question!

No doubt the very loudly opinionated not-web-dev community, who have So Much To Say about web devs and web tech, have produced an uncontroversial, perfect layout system, styling system, and language to produce the replacement for this awful web tech. Where is it? What is it? Please provide (the better version of) a hyperlink to the docs.


There's decades of UI frameworks where the structure of the elements/widgets dictates the layout. HTML/CSS doesn't do that, because it is clearly made to style text documents, not UIs.

So yes I will argue that Qt6 and GTK are better than flexboxes.

Because you asked for it, here's some documentation to a UI framework which I believe to work better than the web stack: https://doc.qt.io/qtforpython-6/PySide6/QtWidgets/index.html


Last year they couldn't draw fingers on hands properly, this year they can't convert at checkouts, I wonder what they'll be failing to do a year from now.


Next years headline will be

> AI accounts for 90% of accidents while only accounting for 1% of traffic


Waymo cars cause 90% fewer accidents than human drivers:

https://abit.ee/en/cars/waymo-robotaxi-autonomous-driving-sa...


Yeah, but consumers can't buy Waymos. They can get dangerously unsafe Teslas and pretend it's the same tech.


"Clanker" is a sign that we're dealing with a Blade Runner, and better be careful


Two-faces' coin is responsible for his actions


Technology isn't intrinsically good or evil. It's how it's used. Like the Death Ray.


Anthropic is not "technology". Anthropic is people, such as this Amodei, a filthy murderer at the service of the big capital.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: