Further, while buddybuild is favored by thousands of because it can can auto-provision iOS devices for you on the fly.
Meaning, you never have to deal with provisioning profiles and UDIDs ever again.
We also care deeply about making sure that teams can involve and engage their end users as part of the development process. One of the reasons we built buddybuild is because of the frustration sending builds to our users... AND then never hearing back from them. Phones are great devices for "consuming content", but it became obvious that the physical form factor of the device tends to result in infrequent feedback which was often ambiguous.
So, we build an SDK that gives you high quality and actionable bug reports from beta users. With a simple screenshot, testers can file bug reports that include graphically annotated screenshots, feedback notes and their device metadata.
We also have a feature called "Instant Replay", which lets you watch a video of the exact steps required to reproduce a crash. Instant Replay works in conjunction with our Crash Reporting solution to offer you both the exact lines of code that caused a crash as well as the exact sequence of events that lead up to it (https://www.buddybuild.com/blog/introducing-instant-replay)
Thousands of teams with fairly complex needs use buddybuild every single day. They teams like Slack, Meetup, FireFox, Wordpress and others..
Could it be that your service is more suited for people working with React?
In a slightly related note, I find it hilarious that people are using a framework made by a company behind what is probably the most hated mobile app ever.
We're a mobile focused continuous integration and deployment solution.
When deciding which platforms to support, we looked at current adoption for Native iOS and Android (this was no brainer), Hybrid (PhoneGap, Ionic, Cordova) and "emerging" platforms (React Native, Xamarin).
Ultimately, we decided to prioritize the others first. CI/CD service is applicable to any mobile development team.. but to your point, buddybuild is better suited to those other platforms, as those are the only ones we support.
In our experience (which also factors inbound requests), Xamarin is still relatively nascent as compared to the others.
That said, you can should expect to see Xamarin support soon :)
Also, fwiw, Microsoft purchased Xamarin only recently.
But this puts your first statement in a completely different light ;)
I should also note that React Native was announced in 2015 while Xamarin was announced in 2011 (with Miguel's work on Mono being much older). Can you then call Xamarin an "emerging" platform?
Buddybuild's crash reporting functionality just got even better.
Instant Replay answers a common question amongst development teams - "how did that happen?" - by showing devs a video replay of exactly what a user was doing in the moments leading up to a crash, which means the dev gets an exact set of steps needed to reproduce it.
You shouldn't notice a webhook deluge because the site isn't generating events. I'm watching our webhook services though and will let you know if that changes.
It spawns agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot) with and without Unblocked's MCP server attached, then statistically compares the results: https://github.com/unblocked/unblocked-harness-compare
We likewise measured token savings, (wall clock) time, # tool calls, and # turns.
reply