It was never on the road to socialism.

Social benefits doesn’t have anything to do with socialism

Who are "The" Chinese?

Are you both talking about the same group?

Only if you include those countries without welfare.

If you look at those with welfare the US are pretty bad.

Lots of money but badly distributed

If your judgment of "badly distributed" comes from all the homeless people that you see, those people have fallen through like a dozen safety nets to get to that point and most of them cannot be helped.

You could literally hire a full-time dedicated team of 10 social workers and mental health professionals to care for 1 crazy SF hobo and it still wouldn't turn around their lives, they're too far gone.

You never see the iceberg of people who are successfully helped by American welfare.

I mean the efficiency.

How much of the money is for actual help and how much for the companies who exploit the system to enrich themselves.

personally identifiable information (PII)

Given that he uses the fake bible quote from Pulp Fiction, I guess they are fighting for fake Jesus

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...

> dishonest or unacceptable behaviour:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bad-fait...

> I just think the security argument is a convenient frame for decisions that are actually about something else.

That would mean they think it’s bad faith. Claiming to do something because of A but to really do it because of B is dishonest

Does that count as prompt injection?

"Aus" means the dog should let go what’s in his mouth.

It means something like "Spuck es aus", "Spit it out"

There are many cases where people use it and the dog does not have anything in their mouth.

You know what happens to a predator who makes its prey go extinct?

AI is doing the same

A cap is a more fundamental fix.

It’s easy to miss a setting especially if new features with opt-out are added