I don't think this is fair, as it will likely also affect any editor with Git integration (or not?)

Yes, likely. And git is not going to fix it. So isn't it fair to expect the editor maintainers to do something about it, to protect their users, no?

Tested with zed and vscode. They don't seem to have the issue. Probably due to "Restricted Access" mode when opening new folder?

Edit: yeah pwned when clicking the big green trust button

No

where did you get this 1%?

It's because you was wrong (or at least not correct). The Mpemba Effect wasn't scientifically proven, and can be explained away with error in measurement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkH2iX0rx8U

That video is also, outdated.

A reliable way of reproducing the effect was found in 2021. [0] Though the precise cause is still unknown.

[0] https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00349-8

Then I was wrong, at least until further research into the topic. Such is the tale of science.

Palantir only select people that are okay with this, so I doubt they say anything here.

obviously, they and their claude didn't think about that

Even acknowledging this flaw, there's a valid reason (simplicity) to design it this way.

"Be kind. Don't be snarky."

I don't get it, what's the difference between "got or don't" vs "it depends"?

The allocator’s output is only two: either you get memory or you don’t. To quote GP

> Every function with an IO interface cannot be reasoned about locally because of unexpected interactions with the io parameter input

This means with IO interface is not quiet clear what WILL happen so it “depends”

The "metrics" is hilarious. The "before AI" graph looks like those meme about FAANG engineers who sit around and basically do nothing.

It's not the same because, with AI, they will likely be called anti-ai or anti-progress if they push back against it.

Don't mention AI, just point out why the code is bad. I've had co-workers who were vim wizards and others who literally hunt and pecked to type. At no point did their tools ever come up when reviewing their code. AI is a tool like anything else, treat it that way. This also means that the OPs default can't be AI == bad; focus on the result.

The thing I don't understand is that you keep bringing up your friends' experience in all your responses and in the blog itself. What about your experience and your success rate and productivity gain that you observed with AI agent? It feels like you yourselves aren't confident on your gain and must bring up second hand experience from your friends to prop up your arguments

the rust code in question is the example on the cursor landing page though

The current image on the landing page might be even worse. It just updates Message to MessageV1. Why would you pay money for what's a string replacement?

The comment on the right says it'll help the user with protocol versioning. This is not how you do that...