I find the bay area TINY compared to the NYC sprawl.

Try reading the story and not just the headline.

"designed for money laundering and tax evasion."

That's reaching. Just because some people use it for that doesn't mean that's what it's designed for.

Agree that it's a media circus. Most of us attend to catch up with old friends.

Indeed. Meth will do that.

PKD had amphetamine problems, not methamphetamine. Though of course they are related, meth is in a different class when it comes to potency. His hallucinations and mental issues started well after he finished a drug rehab program in Vancouver so it's not certain they are related.

As an aside, the dreary, rainy atmosphere of Blade Runner was inspired by Dick's residency in Vancouver.

Was he involved in the making of the movie? Or were the dreary and rainy scenes described in detail in the book?

He was not really involved. He was consulted a bit, and while he disapproved of the original script, it seems he liked the rewrite. He screened a preview and reacted positively to the general feel, however he died before it was completed.

I doubt he was involved. I believe he died only months before the movie’s release. The story/novella describes plenty of grim weather because Earth’s atmosphere has been nearly destroyed.

Certainly. Facebook runs ads outside of just their own site, so they have to track as many folks as possible. Whether they're tracking PII of non FB users though is (hopefully) unlikely.

Those electric bikes are a nightmare. They are so quiet you can't hear them coming. Coupled with how recklessly the delivery guys ride them it's a recipe for disaster. These guys plow through red lights and gun it in the opposite direction on one way streets. Maybe it wouldn't be a problem if these guys didn't ride like assholes.

We don't ban cars. Yet most drivers break laws daily, whether it be failure to signal, exceeding the posted speed limit, or blocking a crosswalk or intersection. No one talks about banning cars outright, even though they kill far more innocent bystanders. If there are dangerous ebike operators they should be ticketed and fined.

In a world with global warming where many cities stated goal is to reduce vehicle miles traveled, it doesn't make sense to ban a valid mode of transportation.

"We don't ban cars. Yet most drivers break laws daily..." Your explanation is in your own statement. The cars aren't breaking the laws. The drivers are. They are penalized for breaking laws, and if they continue or break a law serious enough, they will be banned from driving.

This is actually a legitimate critique of what I wrote. Vehicle operators, from ebikes riders to motorists need to be the ones blamed for crashes and other bad behaviors. That said, my post is advocating for the same treatment of bikers as drivers. The government doesn't generally seize cars (unless it's blocking traffic or parking), the same process should be applied to bikes.

How many people have they killed this year?

Just two days Dorothy Bruns in Park Slope ran through a red light, killed a four year old and a one year old. A pregnant woman is still in critical condition. She hasn't been arrested.

Maybe the NYPD should concentrate on felonies before worrying about violations.

The “how many people have been killed” is a really poor test of if something is right or wrong.

"They startled me" is a bad reason to think something is unsafe. I'd wager if you saturated the streets of any American city with "rude" ebike riders, the serious injury rate would go down pretty quickly, as drivers learned to accept humans in the street.

As long as an alternative is regularly killing people, it seems like a decent test to me.

So they should ticket dangerous riders, not ban e-bikes outright.

Yes, this. The problem isn’t ebikes or bikes, it’s dangerous riding.

You're dealing with an administration that similarly believes guns kill people, not that the people that use the guns to kill people are responsible.

Many drivers are reckless and break laws consistently. They also often don't share the road with bikes very well. We don't ban them.

Why would we? Asking motor vehicle drivers to "share the road" with bicycle riders is asinine, destined to fail, and uniquely American.

And I say this having grown up my entire life without a car, biking everywhere. I'd take tickets for riding on the sidewalk, and I'll do it every single day I ride. Sharing a road with 2500lb vehicles that go 2-5x my speed is unsafe and all the talking and lane marking in the world will never undo that fact. Nevermind how utterly anti-social and rude you must be to bike in a lane 20mph under the speed limit.

I spend as much time as possible in the Netherlands since they seem to be about the only sane country when it comes to mixed-mode transportation and not trying to murder people while doing so.

> Why would we? Asking motor vehicle drivers to "share the road" with bicycle riders is asinine, destined to fail, and uniquely American.

Don't worry it's not uniquely American:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-28/wa-to-introduce-minimu...

But is it asinine and destined to fail? I'm not sure.

I think that it IS possible to share the roads but only under low-traffic and low-speed conditions.

The worst offenders are cyclists on busy dual-carriageways during peak hour and it is horrendously dangerous, with two lanes of traffic forced to snake around a single cyclist.

On side streets however I don't think it's a big deal at all.

> Asking motor vehicle drivers to "share the road" with bicycle riders is asinine, destined to fail, and uniquely American.

It isn't uniquely American. There's no need to make over the top claims. It undermines your points.

Start reading books instead of consuming digital content piecemeal.

Sounds like they forgot it's a volatile market where 30% drops are the norm.

Some believe that it can easily scale to the that point, but there are corrupt and powerful people who are stifling that effort.

Some people believe the earth is flat, too. I'd rather hear a detailed discussion than a summary.