Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | binarynate's commentslogin


At a friend's party recently, I met someone who told me that they had worked in data for Meta's glasses division and warned me never to get Meta glasses for this very reason—that the workers can see everything. They told me of a comical case where a guy pulled down his pants to look at his penis, asked "Meta, what is this?", and the AI responded that it was a thumb. XD


This means actual Meta/Facebook employees are seeing or at least hearing about actual footage. Not just third-world contractor employees.

Absolutely crazy that a Meta employee saying not to buy them. Everyone should know this right now.


Better response than "Somewhat smaller than average"


Ah, maybe he shouldn't have shared that. Or at least aimed for something larger than a thumb.


[flagged]


Have you even read the article? It is literally citing farms in Kenya where workers look at user footage and annotate videos.


For a fair comparison, you need to compare audio of David as a broadcaster rather than being interviewed: https://youtu.be/W-uGqHXoSRw?t=5 . As someone who has listened to Greene's voice on NPR a lot over the years, I hear the similarity.


Rollerblade technology has come a long way since then! Modern skates are much more comfortable and often use bigger wheels that make it easier to roll over rougher terrain and go fast. I get around Chicago almost exclusively through a combination of inline skates & trains (it's easy to wear skates on the trains here).


Although developers may be hesitant to embrace this out of fear of Google eventually killing it off, an upshot is that if you develop an XR app with Unity (and its XR Interaction Toolkit library), it ends up being quite portable across different XR devices / operating systems (e.g. Meta Quest, Pico VR, HTC Vive).


Is this the same Unity that tried to mess everyone around a while ago with stupid licensing changes?

Damn, the older I get the more it seems that every company is untrustworthy.


Yes but unreal is just as good an option.


I haven't upgraded to iOS 26 because of Liquid Glass, mostly because I've read that it causes performance degradation on older devices (I use an iPhone 13 Mini because I have zero interest in using a larger phone). So, it looks like I'll be using iOS 18 for the foreseeable future.


I made the mistake of upgrading (13 Mini) and it is very clear that the new UI was not tested at all on smaller screens. The rounded buttons take up so much extra margin that actual usable space is greatly diminished.


How's the battery on your 13 Mini? Mine is abhorrent compared to a few weeks ago.


I have a 12 mini and have also found that 26 has killed my battery life.

I also agree that they didn’t test it on smaller screens, there are lots of cases where things don’t quite fit right.

I’ve been wanting a better camera for a little while, I guess it’s time to adjust to something bigger :\


Same here - on a 12 Mini. My wife and my mother have the same phone, and I have recommended that they hold back on upgrading.

I really hope Apple will address this in a dot-upgrade later this year, but I am afraid that the market share of the 12 and 13 models are too low for them to justify this.


I have the standard iPhone 13 (not mini) and the battery longevity is probably the best of any phone I've ever owned. At over 3.5 years old it still reports 89% battery health and lasts much longer than I need. Previous iPhones I owned were all pretty much on their last legs by that age.

I haven't upgraded it to iOS 26 / Liquid Glass, though, and given what I'm seeing/hearing, I don't plan to.


The question was how much the update to iOS 26 affected battery life


On the iPhone 13 Mini


I like to rant about my iPhone 13's great battery, any chance I can get!


U+1FAE1 SALUTING FACE


I just replaced it before the 26 upgrade. It was at 76% by then. With the new battery, I haven’t faced any issues. It lasts a whole day easily, unless I do things like tethering etc.


Replied at the same time as you. I agree. In Safari there’s ton of space on each side of the URL bubble yet I only get about 7 chara visible.


There is a Safari setting to improve this, although it adds height. Still preferable, imo.


The mini’s logical resolution is actually the same as the Pro Max with Display Zoom, hence the latter will have the same issue.


Same. Terrible mistake. My mini overheats like crazy now.


On the mini, some UI elements got half pushed into Narnia. Apple, like, WTF?!


I regret upgrading my 13 Mini so much. Performance is terrible and it's chugging power.

Yesterday, for the first time since I bought the phone, it died on me before 18:00 with regular usage. I used to charge everyday when I go to bed with around 15-25% left, now I can't even finish the work day.


I have an iphone 13 pro max. On many screens, the UI now stutters when it was smooth before. I have a very strong dislike for the new transparency changes. It absolutely makes things harder to read. And it comes at a cost of making the UI stutter. For example I just scrolled down the notifications, they are all a little harder to read because the the phone is trying to show the background through the notification area?

Why would anybody want that?


On iPhone 12 mini, the battery life is incredibly worse. I was charging once a day, 30 → 70% usually, and now I’m charging all the time I have a chance. I’m not very active user, but each session of screen time reduces the battery significantly. Before that I felt that despite the small battery, the device works forever. Now, I’m back into my iPhone 4S times, when I upgraded to iOS 7.


For what it’s worth, I upgraded to 26 on a 3rd gen SE and perf is totally fine. I do hate most of the UI changes though. I really hope they do a dot release that lets me turn off the “safari viewport is big but we draw crap on top of it” stuff. I keep cursing at the title bar and url bar obscuring important things.


Performance is fine on my SE 3rd gen as well


It has horrible battery life, even on a relatively new device. Don’t upgrade.


This is the worst part of it.

I actually feel a warm computer now, something that I have never experienced in five years of having this M1 MacBook.

This takes amazing hardware and degrades it to Windows laptop slop.

In the Jobs days, at least one VP head would roll for this, and Apple would be far better off for it. I don't think Tim Cook is strong enough for that though.


I just think that Apple should go down to biannual phone updates and major OS versions. I really don’t understand the urgency behind forcing this kind of velocity for such a mature system. It seems perpetually rushed.


I run these commands when I boot my M1 Pro Macbook. It greatly improved general usability:

#!/bin/bash launchctl setenv CHROME_HEADLESS 1 defaults write -g NSAutoFillHeuristicControllerEnabled -bool false

This removes drop shadows on Chromium / Electron, and removes an autofill overlay that people reported heavy battery use on. I took this from somewhere on the internet.


It was running well on my 13 pro as in there was no lag on anything, but I can’t speak for battery life. It was bad before and it was still bad after, but maybe it got worse?


iOS .0 releases tend to be this way, even on brand new devices. I noticed some big perf improvements on the 26.0.1 release. If I were you I'd wait til 26.1 or 26.2 and reassess then. It still may not be optimal for a mini tho for non-perf reasons, as iOS26 assumes a larger average device size.


It's functionally tolerable when you disable transparency and increase contrast in accessibility settings.

Of course it makes everything look dull and primitive. Crammed and misaligned controls are even more obvious when elements have borders. You still have unhelpful animations.


I have an iPhone 13 and haven’t noticed. Don’t love it though.

The safari changes are the worst part.


Upgraded my 12 mini. Performance is fine. Battery life is as it always was


Well I guess I'm not updating my iPhone 11 then!


Same here, iOS 18 already felt a bit sluggish compared to 17, but sadly Apple stopped signing 17 some days before I discovered you can downgrade.

26 is definitely not for older devices. Heck, 26 is probably not for any device, this article makes UX look like crap.


I have a 12 mini and it works well.

IMO, this is 99% typical "not what I'm used to" internet rage. Upgrade and enjoy.


As humble as Michigan City is, it's also a popular vacation destination for Hoosiers seeking an inexpensive summer getaway. I grew up in Indiana and have many fond memories of going to Michigan City in the summer: swimming at the beach, walking to the lighthouse and zoo, and looking at Chicago's skyline from across the lake. As a kid, I thought the power plant tower was cool, too.


Clarification: Unity's "Industry" license is only for non-gaming and non-entertainment applications (e.g. automotive, architecture, etc.). So this doesn't impact developers developing games with Unity.


Until it's an established payment model for one product category, after which it fill feel more natural to extend it to others.

The worst part of it isn't even that devs would get their wallets shaken out but that it's really just surveillance in disguise. Those apps would “““have to””” spy on me as an end-user in order for them to know what to charge.


I switched to unreal several years ago because Unity had written hundreds of gigabytes of log files complaining that it could not phone home and filled up my hard drive


I hope you filed a bug report.


I think phoning home is the platform for data collecting ("advertising") revenue.


Unity has always had a separate license for the other types of applications, so it's a slippery slope argument without a slope.

The issue here is the surveillance aspect.


Now thinking about it, its so valid point, how would that even work though if I am being honest

like I am pretty sure that the only way that they can do this is via giving it internet access and if that's the case, I wonder how much spying it does on our computer before sending it to unity headquarters in the name of this industry fees

Please, someone create a #usegodot or some twitter thing to just get it trending. We need to use goodot (I tried typing godot but I wrote goodot TWICE which is so funny and ironical so I am keeping it here)

Also I wonder how it might stand in eu / gdpr


Unreal already has % of revenue. How do they track that, and is this any different?

Aka my guess it's a combination of trust, verification using public numbers (like downloads on Steam) and the ability to do audits of some kind?


I believe that’s correct. It’s primarily on you to report revenues and they can audit you if they think you’re lying.


Unity knows what project you're building and if you've built it under a paid license before. If they notice you using a free license, they'll go after you.


If only godot was good. I think Stride3D has more chances of being a good replacement.


That sounds well and good, but Unity forced my last company into the more expensive license unilaterally and with no discussion. They doubled our costs just because they can.

At this point, we should all treat Unity like we do Broadcom. Utterly toxic and should be avoided at all costs because they will shake you down and leave you with a lesser product for no reason other than blind greed.

Nothing Unity does will ever recover the goodwill they nuked for money


I would expect no less from a company that acquired/merged with IronSource...


Did you change to another engine? If so, which one? If not, what prevented you from doing so?

Genuinely curious.


We did not. Most of our contracts were integrating our stack into the customer's existing Unity project.

Plus we'd have to either re-train our Unity devs (more than half the software team) or find new developers.

The extravagant cost of a Unity seat meant we couldn't afford to give anyone except the Unity devs a license. The rest of the software team can no longer tweak the Unity project, and instead must file a ticket for one of the Unity devs to make the change and upload a build. For the same reason, we couldn't set up a build server in our CI system.

It was an absolute nightmare. At the end, I had to resort to ripping apart old copies of our android apps to inject new libraries into them. We couldn't afford Unity at all by that point, so it was the only option to get things working right now.

So glad that my new job has nothing to do with Unity or desktop software at all.


*for now


Thank you. I really do not understand why anyone trusts Unity to keep this for only non-entertainment if it proves successful. They only backed off before because the backlash was so bad. Assuming that means they won't try to find ways to slowly bring it back in the future is dangerous to me.


It does, though, because it means you don't have the freedom to pivot to other industries, or to fork for use in industry, which is a thing that can happen. It's definitely a reason to consider avoiding Unity.


It makes less sense in automotive or architecture than games. Games scale incredibly well and practically for free, cars not so much.



Video that includes the radio communication between the control tower and the pilots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mp9aUJaTY


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: