Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aspenmayer's commentslogin

I believe you’re referring to Egan’s book Permutation City. It’s pretty decent and holds up well today despite being written in 1994.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permutation_City


It might well be, yes -- it's a long time now, I have read all his published novels except maybe in the last couple of years, and I am not sure which one is which.

Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge and Accelerando by Charles Stross both have a lot of parallels with current AI and Internet developments, and are great books to boot. Accelerando has free ebook versions available, which I am happy to share, thanks to the author and publisher. I can’t recommend cstross highly enough. Vinge needs no introduction, though the work mentioned is somewhat less well known and later than his more renowned works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows_End_(Vinge_novel)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerando

https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/fiction/acceler...


To be fair, we don’t have many government mules these days, but it wasn’t always so, and not so long ago.

The current amount of horsepower on the hoof is a rounding error, but before mechanized farming and war-fighting, these distinctions were the difference.

If we consider the capacity of technology to act as a force multiplier, it is reasonable to assume that current and future AI-assisted fighting forces can achieve more with less traditional materiel and with fewer personnel.

Drones are an especially likely way that these many AIs will become embodied and diversify, in which case I don’t think the percentages are so far-fetched.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62662gzlp8o

> Further ahead in the future, it wants its machines to be programmed to travel autonomously to a location, carry out its task - such as watching out for advancing enemy soldiers and engaging them if necessary - and then return to base after a certain time.


> I’ll start working on an HN comment in a few weeks and try to remember to post it back to this thread

iirc HN threads automatically close, due to inactivity and (/or?) based on time since the original post. I wasn’t able to find a thread with the comments still open from 16 days ago, let alone a “few weeks”, but in good faith I’m assuming that you already know that, and aren’t using that as an out to avoid replying, not that anyone is “owed” a reply by you, or by anyone.

This is all to say, I appreciate the thread as a bystander, and would thus naturally eagerly await your reply if and when it arrives before the closure of individual this post’s comment section.


Wake me up when September ends.

à la the eponymous Hiro Protagonist


I think this might be the repo?

https://github.com/zhouxinan/airsnitch

Edit: it’s the same repo as linked in the paper, so it seems likely to be the correct repo, though I didn’t originally find it via the paper.


Twitter has settings for who can reply to tweets, which are configurable per post. You can make it so that only people you follow can reply.


Original reporting is allowed and encouraged by the Wikimedia Foundation sister org Wikinews, which may be cited by Wikipedia.

https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Original_reporting


Wikinews is on hold nowadays. Original research that is of real long-term relevance can go onto Wikijournal, which does peer review.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: