Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | annica's commentslogin

Location: Las Vegas, NV

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: C, C++, Python, JavaScript

Résumé/CV: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XKw3Kx3HynJ9ifnCcx0csn86...

Email: sam.barranco at gmail


Software generalist with experience in a variety of environments.

Location: Las Vegas, NV

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: C/C++/Python/Javascript

Resume:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XKw3Kx3HynJ9ifnCcx0csn86...

Email: sam.barranco@gmail.com


Location: Las Vegas, NV

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies C/C++/Python/Javascript

Resume: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XKw3Kx3HynJ9ifnCcx0csn86...

Email: sam dot barranco at gmail

Software engineer with 10+ years experience.


Fixed, thanks for the heads up :)


I think multiple forms of consciousness exist now. ADHD, autism?

I think it’s a good thing.


Software Engineer

Location: Nevada

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: LLMs, C++, JS, Unreal, React/Fiber, Next

Résumé/CV: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wmQL6ZKkTJcmNW1C_wSUxjTE...

Email: sam.barranco[AT]gmail


Worse it's used to perpetuate this scheme:

"Tipped employees must receive a minimum wage of $2.13 per hour, known as a cash wage. That cash wage is combined with tips to reach the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. (Many states and localities, listed below, have minimum wages set above the federal rate)."

The idea being that you will fit the bill for their labor costs through tips instead of paying it themselves. Somehow the tipping idea perpetuated such that they can and do pay less than minimum wage because of the prevalence of tipping.

https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/tipped-minimum-wa...


Hey kids. Big Ben. Parliament.

https://youtu.be/iAgX6qlJEMc?feature=shared


I could see how these have benefits in some cases. There are also drawbacks… the uncertainty of who is yielding (except maybe by AI). What about snow and ice? If you do some searching there are plenty of reasons why you might not want roundabouts.


> the uncertainty of who is yielding

Same we know red light means stop. You make up a rule.

In Australia anyone from the right has right of way.


It’s not the same though. Red means stop. It is ambiguous as to who must yield precisely because there is no red light to indicate it. What would the rule be? Your best guess as to the speed and distance of the other driver?


There is no ambiguity in practice because these only happen on T intersections. These rules also apply on low / moderate traffic + intersections with no issues mainly because you are expected to pay attention to the road and not just breeze through every intersection like a maniac.


There is ambiguity in practice. Accidents do happen in roundabouts and t intersections without anyone driving like “a maniac”. The point is that the article doesn’t really discuss the drawbacks of roundabouts of which there are many.


I was referring to the "give way to the right" theory, not the roundabout theory. Which you also must give way to your right.

If humans are involved, of course there are problems, because humans are error prone, the question is if its a problem, which from my limited experience of 30 years of driving is not a significant problem in Australia.


When you approach a round about you must slow down, check your right, and then proceed. It works the same as a stop or yield sign.

In a 2 lane roundabout both lanes should be free before moving into it.

I mean, you can't rely on stop lights either. I've seen plenty of people run reds. What do you do then?


In most countries traffic already on the roundabout has priority, as is clearly indicated by the presence of yield signs. There is literally zero uncertainty.


It’s a nice gesture, but what is the point if most of the parts are soldered and can’t be upgraded anyway.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: