Duplicate, previously posted 6 times already in the last 3 days.

- I Decompiled the White House's New App (thereallo.dev) 14 points by edvinbesic 5 hours ago | 2 comments

- I Decompiled the White House's New App (thereallo.dev) 4 points by Mike-E 1 day ago | 2 comments

- I Decompiled the White House's New App (thereallo.dev) 5 points by gpi 2 days ago | 1 comment

- Decompiled White House's New App (thereallo.dev) 5 points by alokDT 2 days ago | 2 comments

- I Decompiled the White House's New App (thereallo.dev) 6 points by ohjeez 3 days ago | 1 comment

- I decompiled the White House's new app (thereallo.dev) 657 points by amarcheschi 3 days ago | 267 comments

> 657 points by amarcheschi 3 days ago | 267 comments

is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555556

Ugh, Disney has had the anti-Midas touch with their acquisitions. Hopefully they spin off the Unreal Engine unit as a separate entity if such a thing comes to pass.

"Our software developers clearly were negligent, but we stashed some bullshit legalese saying 'No warranty express or implied' into a document no one will read so our bug-infested software is completely OK."

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569358 , including the comment, on a fresh account?

anyone who touches this topic on HN gets flagged/banned, so they're probably trying to avoid that

They are but somebody has to bring it to the attention of the HN moderators by emailing them for that to happen.

There's at least two comments in this submission from green accounts if you enable showdead.

"Past performance is not indicative of future results." and "Don't count your chickens before they've hatched." except in the world of the AI advocates, where they confidently assure us that it's perfectly fine to count our AI chickens before they've hatched because reasons.

The HN moderators have repeatedly said that they have not seen evidence of coordinated downvoting, e.g.: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46378818

Test it out then. Say something critical about Israel. See the downvote my original reply has.

I sort of agree in the sense that this particular thing has been FLAGGED on 3 different occasions...

and your original comment has been flagged as well, so I am not even sure what it might've said in the first place.

The site moderators have said that they do not see @ mentions. If you want to reach them, use the email address on the contact page linked at the bottom of the page.

Re-submitting links to try to force attention to it is also not the correct approach. If you believe a story has been wrongly flagged, directly email the HN administrators with a link to the original submission.

Calling the catastrophic dotcom bust that imploded ~50% of internet companies and caused a ~90% drop in combined market valuation for the remainder and nearly wiped out market leaders like Sun Microsystems and Cisco merely as side effects "A few early companies failing to find product-market fit before the money runs out..." is a very peculiar take.

Nothing peculiar about it. You’re making the same category error as the blog: Trying to equate the failure of a few companies with the failure of a technology.

You’re also trying to include companies which did not fail in your argument about the dot com bubble. Cisco is a very large and thriving company today and networking equipment is everywhere. Why would you use that as an example?