Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OrvalWintermute's commentslogin

If you sell to the War Department, the CIA, the NSA, or ICE/Border Patrol, you know exactly how it is going to be used.

This after the fact naiveté by Anthropic is crazy.

Speaking as a patriot I’d be incredibly proud if my tool was used in a supporting role for one of the most perfect military operations ever executed.

This would likely be the Hallmark of my advertising for the near future.

Instead, we have anthropic going on a fishing expedition for information to claim a TOS violation and rightfully getting the boot! :)


> If you sell to the War Department, the CIA, the NSA, or ICE/Border Patrol, you know exactly how it is going to be used.

Yes, you know their use of your services will legally be limited by the contact you both signed.

> This after the fact naiveté by Anthropic is crazy.

The real naiveté here is in the government signing a contract they ended up not liking after all, and in viewers who don't realize that there was a signed contract on place already, which included said restrictions.

> Speaking as a patriot I’d be incredibly proud if my tool was used in a supporting role for one of the most perfect military operations ever executed.

The usage we're talking about is exclusively: mass domestic surveillance of civilians; and fully-autonomous killbots which can (and will) be used against those same civilians. Weird pride to have.


You seem awfully excited by the idea of the government performing domestic mass surveillance

Palantir was trying to do the right thing.

Anthropic is trying to sell to the government while simultaneously dictating terms on how AI is used in the war department.

When you sell to the War department, or the IC, you can be certain that they are going to use it for planning operations and for executing operations.


Actually Anthropic is just refusing to renegotiate a contract. If the DoW cared so much about these restrictions, they shouldn't have signed the contract. Attempting to mike the company is childish behavior that will be stopped in court.

The story is they started fishing for classified info on how their tooling was used from their prime contractor, Palantir, who rightfully blew the whistle on them and told DOD what they were up to.

https://fortune.com/2026/03/07/pentagon-emil-michael-anthrop...


You mean their signed and finalized contract was being violated and they started discussions about how violating said contract is not okay?

It's more like the government blew the whistle themselves that they were trying to use Anthropic's services in a manner contrary to law.

I support the rights of Democrat & Republican administrations to designate certain companies as supply chain risks OR a national security risk.

I do not want a TikTok hoovering up our personal info sending it to China

I do not want a Anthropic becoming essential to warfare then questioning when the their AI is used to bring an enemy to justice

I do not want Nvidia sending their latest and greatest to China

I do not want a ASML moving their super advanced photolithography machines to China

I do not want a DJI selling their drones in the US and then exporting all the meta-data back to China

I do not want a Huawei hacking through American IT companies and then getting a free pass on selling their devices based on stolen IP in the US


You certainly seem to support the government designating a company a SCR at gunpoint when they refuse to renegotiate a signed, agreed to, and finalized contract.

...You realize the only valid uses of supply chain risk you mentioned were DJI and Huawei. TikTok isn't providing services to the U.S. Gov. Anthropic is an American company with no foreign ownership. A supplier does not have to sell it's product to a government it knows is liable to misuse it. Not as a SaaS provider. Nvidia and ASML are both now covered under ITAR. Your specification of Democrat &Republican admins just demonstrates both are two sides of the same coin. Both need a good and thorough cleaning out.

Anthropic has private ownership from a bunch of foreign investors GIC and MGX for one.

Not saying this action is correct or not but Anthropic has no reason to decline Chinese investment if they could get it. Neither does openAI.

It's insane people consider private companies should have free speech.

When they can't and aren't willing to do the same for private citizens. People being shot on streets didn't see any court cases?

I find hn to be quite brain dead in terms of what it chooses to care about.


> My conscious is a tiny bit cleaner

I think he meant my conscience.

Used to think Google was awesome when they were hyper accurate, fast, and not enshittifying products.

Now I am convinced they are just a little bit better than Meta.


Google has been evil for at least a decade, if not longer than that.

This is just pigslop masquerading as a moral stand.

What happened to the OG Google that cared about users, prioritized honest search, fast performance, and didn't murder pages with ads?


> evil

They never removed "don't be evil", they just changed where it is in the document.


wow that is fast!


The RISC-V growth is fairly spectacular; moving forward the CAGR is estimated at > 40%


RISC-V could completely eat ARM for lunch if they try to jack up fees under the guise of "value extraction", and not through true value creation.

In 2 years from this date, I fully expect the safety critical RISC-V chips like the forthcoming High Performance Spaceflight Computer (HPSC) from Microchip, Inc.[0], and derivatives [1] [2] leveraging SiFive IP[3], and other RISC-V competitors [4] to take a dominant position in Space, Aerospace, Aviation, and potentially other less cost-sensitive industries where RTOS dominate.

This raises a few questions in my mind:

Could that extend to vehicles and other use-cases?

Will we see more derivatives with even higher performance beyond the already announced PolarFire2 designed specifically for terrestrial use?

I don't know how sensitive their overall BOMs are to high priced reliable chips designed for fault tolerance...

I don't know how fast the quality of the mass market chinese RISC-V chips will ascend the perceived quality gap, and expand offerings into newer profiles [5]

Where will the toolchain for RISC-V be on a specific chip basis?

Is Nvidia likely to expand their usage of RISC-V?

[0] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/microprocessors/64-...

[1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/microprocessors/64-...

[2] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/microprocessors/64-...

[3] https://www.sifive.com/

[4] https://www.gaisler.com/products/gr765

[5] https://docs.riscv.org/reference/profiles/rva23/_attachments...


> In 2 years from this date, I fully expect the safety critical RISC-V chips like the forthcoming High Performance Spaceflight Computer (HPSC) from Microchip, Inc.[0], and derivatives [1] [2] leveraging SiFive IP[3], and other RISC-V competitors [4] to take a dominant position in Space, Aerospace, Aviation, and potentially other less cost-sensitive industries where RTOS dominate

They already are in India [0][1], but SiFive helped build a portion of the ecosystem in India as well [2].

I'm sure there are similar applications in China but I'd need help pointing to a specific initiative. I know Tenstorrent is hitching their wagon to China especially after poaching Arm China leadership.

> Could that extend to vehicles and other use-cases

They already are in India [3][4][8] - this is something the US and Indian governments as well as American and Indian VCs and corporations are collaborating on together. One such collaboration has already IPOed [5], seen combat, and begun helping develop capacity within America [6]. And another has recently announced a mega-raise with General Catalyst [7]. RISC-V design is on the roadmap as well in this relationship.

[0] - https://www.iitm.ac.in/happenings/press-releases-and-coverag...

[1] - https://www.isro.gov.in/vikram3201.html

[2] - https://www.sifive.com/blog/sifive-expands-presence-in-india...

[3] - https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20260209VL216/risc-v-automot...

[4] - https://www.mindgrovetech.in/s2401-secure-iot

[5] - https://www.qualcommventures.com/insights/blog/ideaforge-fro...

[6] - https://firstbreach.com/news/first-breach-signs-jv-with-idea...

[7] - https://www.generalcatalyst.com/stories/our-investment-in-ra...

[8] - https://incoresemi.com/


Hi, CEO of Mindgrove here!

Good to see that we're being noticed. But we all still need to deploy (in scale) to make anything worthwhile.


Best of luck Shash! Been following you guys since your IITM days!


I love you!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: